NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 4
Board No: 2
Dealer: E, Vul: NS, Room Datum: -40
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
20 PROCTOR Team 17 PAULL Team 1 E 3C 7 70 -6 6 16 TUCKEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 1NT E 3C 7 90 -6 6 18 LOVEDAY Team 15 ROBINSON Team 2 W KD 9 140 -6 6 9 ROUGHEY Team 12 RYAN Team 1NT E 3C 7 90 -5 5 10 TALL Team 1 RIDLEY Team 2 N QS 7 100 -5 5 4 PERRY Team 8 MORRISON Team 2 W KD 8 110 -5 5 19 POWLEY Team 3 VACHON Team 1NT E 2C 7 90 -5 5 2 KING Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 3NT S 5H 7 200 -3 3 6 MCDONALD Team 5 ROGERS Team 2 S 5H 6 200 -3 3 11 STONEMAN Team 14 HARINGTON Team 1NT E 3C 8 120 -1 1 14 HARINGTON Team 11 STONEMAN Team 2 S 8S 7 100 1 -1 7 MIDGLEY Team 2 KING Team 1NT E 3C 7 90 3 -3 5 ROGERS Team 6 MCDONALD Team 1NT E 3C 7 90 3 -3 3 VACHON Team 19 POWLEY Team 1 E 5H 5 100 5 -5 8 MORRISON Team 4 PERRY Team 1 E TH 5 100 5 -5 12 RYAN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 2 N QC 8 90 5 -5 1 RIDLEY Team 10 TALL Team 1 E TH 5 100 5 -5 15 ROBINSON Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2 N QC 8 90 6 -6 17 PAULL Team 20 PROCTOR Team 4 E 8D 7 150 6 -6 13 MADSEN Team 16 TUCKEY Team 1NT E 3C 4 150 6 -6
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 2 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
1NT by EW | -3 | 150 | 1 |
4 by EW | -3 | 150 | 1 |
1 by EW | -2 | 100 | 3 |
2 by NS | = | 90 | 2 |
1 by EW | = | -70 | 1 |
1NT by EW | = | -90 | 5 |
2 by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |
2 by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |
2 by EW | = | -110 | 1 |
1NT by EW | +1 | -120 | 1 |
2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 1 |
3NT by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
2 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |