BUNDABERG TEAMS - MATCH 1
Board No: 2
Dealer: E, Vul: NS, Room Datum: -60
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 LORRAWAY Team 12 HICKMAN Team 2 
E6 100 2 -2 2 ALLAN Team 13 PALASTHY Team 2 
E9 140 -1 1 3 HARRIS Team 14 COTTER Team 3 
S7 200 -2 2 4 STONEMAN Team 15 MASON Team 1NT W 7 90 0 0 5 METCALF Team 16 GALLETLEY Team 2 E8 110 -4 4 6 BUNDENSEN Team 17 AKHTAR Team 1NT W 7 90 1 -1 7 GORDON Team 18 LOVE Team 3 E8 50 0 0 8 FISHER Team 19 BLOORE Team 2 E8 110 5 -5 9 MAYES Team 20 BOWMAN Team 1NT W 7 90 0 0 10 LOHMANN Team 21 BLACK Team 2 E7 50 4 -4 11 TUCKEY Team 22 VAN HAREN Team 4 E7 150 7 -7 12 HICKMAN Team 1 LORRAWAY Team 3 E8 50 -2 2 13 PALASTHY Team 2 ALLAN Team 2 E8 110 1 -1 14 COTTER Team 3 HARRIS Team 2 E9 140 2 -2 15 MASON Team 4 STONEMAN Team 1NT W 7 90 0 0 16 GALLETLEY Team 5 METCALF Team 3 E8 50 4 -4 17 AKHTAR Team 6 BUNDENSEN Team 2 E8 110 -1 1 18 LOVE Team 7 GORDON Team 2 E7 50 0 0 19 BLOORE Team 8 FISHER Team 3 S6 300 -5 5 20 BOWMAN Team 9 MAYES Team 1NT W 7 90 0 0 21 BLACK Team 10 LOHMANN Team 2 E8 110 -4 4 22 VAN HAREN Team 11 TUCKEY Team 1NT W 8 120 -7 7
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 2 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 4 by EW | -3 | 150 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | -2 | 100 | 1 |
| 3 by EW | -1 | 50 | 3 |
| 2 by EW | -1 | 50 | 2 |
| 1NT by EW | = | -90 | 5 |
| 2 by EW | = | -110 | 5 |
| 1NT by EW | +1 | -120 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | -3 | -300 | 1 |