NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 1
Board No: 3
Dealer: S, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -110
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
4 PERRY Team 14 HARINGTON Team 1NT E 7S 11 210 -7 7 18 LOVEDAY Team 8 MORRISON Team 1NT E 9C 10 180 -4 4 2 KING Team 12 RYAN Team 3 N AC 6 150 -1 1 19 POWLEY Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 2 E 9S 10 130 -2 2 1 RIDLEY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 1NT E 2S 8 120 0 0 12 RYAN Team 2 KING Team 1NT E 2S 8 120 1 -1 13 MADSEN Team 3 VACHON Team 1NT E 9C 8 120 -1 1 7 MIDGLEY Team 17 PAULL Team 1NT E 8C 8 120 -1 1 16 TUCKEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 1NT E 7S 8 120 -1 1 11 STONEMAN Team 1 RIDLEY Team 2 E 7S 9 110 0 0 20 PROCTOR Team 10 TALL Team 2 N AC 6 100 0 0 3 VACHON Team 13 MADSEN Team 2 N AC 6 100 1 -1 5 ROGERS Team 15 ROBINSON Team 2 N 6H 6 100 0 0 17 PAULL Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 2 N KC 6 100 1 -1 15 ROBINSON Team 5 ROGERS Team 2 N AC 6 100 0 0 6 MCDONALD Team 16 TUCKEY Team 1NT E 4H 7 90 1 -1 10 TALL Team 20 PROCTOR Team 1NT E 2S 7 90 0 0 8 MORRISON Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2 N AC 7 50 4 -4 9 ROUGHEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 2 N 5H 7 50 2 -2 14 HARINGTON Team 4 PERRY Team 3 E 9S 8 100 7 -7
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 3 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2 by NS | -1 | -50 | 2 |
1NT by EW | = | -90 | 2 |
2 by NS | -2 | -100 | 5 |
2 by EW | +1 | -110 | 1 |
1NT by EW | +1 | -120 | 5 |
2 by EW | +2 | -130 | 1 |
3 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
1NT by EW | +3 | -180 | 1 |
1NT by EW | +4 | -210 | 1 |