NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 1
Board No: 3
Dealer: S, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -110
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
14 HARINGTON Team 4 PERRY Team 3 E 9S 8 100 7 -7 9 ROUGHEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 2 N 5H 7 50 2 -2 8 MORRISON Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2 N AC 7 50 4 -4 10 TALL Team 20 PROCTOR Team 1NT E 2S 7 90 0 0 6 MCDONALD Team 16 TUCKEY Team 1NT E 4H 7 90 1 -1 5 ROGERS Team 15 ROBINSON Team 2 N 6H 6 100 0 0 15 ROBINSON Team 5 ROGERS Team 2 N AC 6 100 0 0 3 VACHON Team 13 MADSEN Team 2 N AC 6 100 1 -1 17 PAULL Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 2 N KC 6 100 1 -1 20 PROCTOR Team 10 TALL Team 2 N AC 6 100 0 0 11 STONEMAN Team 1 RIDLEY Team 2 E 7S 9 110 0 0 12 RYAN Team 2 KING Team 1NT E 2S 8 120 1 -1 13 MADSEN Team 3 VACHON Team 1NT E 9C 8 120 -1 1 7 MIDGLEY Team 17 PAULL Team 1NT E 8C 8 120 -1 1 16 TUCKEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 1NT E 7S 8 120 -1 1 1 RIDLEY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 1NT E 2S 8 120 0 0 19 POWLEY Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 2 E 9S 10 130 -2 2 2 KING Team 12 RYAN Team 3 N AC 6 150 -1 1 18 LOVEDAY Team 8 MORRISON Team 1NT E 9C 10 180 -4 4 4 PERRY Team 14 HARINGTON Team 1NT E 7S 11 210 -7 7
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 3 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2 by NS | -1 | -50 | 2 |
1NT by EW | = | -90 | 2 |
2 by NS | -2 | -100 | 5 |
2 by EW | +1 | -110 | 1 |
1NT by EW | +1 | -120 | 5 |
2 by EW | +2 | -130 | 1 |
3 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
1NT by EW | +3 | -180 | 1 |
1NT by EW | +4 | -210 | 1 |