NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 1
Board No: 6
Dealer: E, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 80
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 RIDLEY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 1NT E 7C 4 300 8 -8 2 KING Team 12 RYAN Team 2 
N2C 7 50 -4 4 3 VACHON Team 13 MADSEN Team 2 
S9D 10 130 6 -6 4 PERRY Team 14 HARINGTON Team 2 SJH 9 110 1 -1 5 ROGERS Team 15 ROBINSON Team 2 S3H 9 110 0 0 6 MCDONALD Team 16 TUCKEY Team 2NT S 9D 10 180 2 -2 7 MIDGLEY Team 17 PAULL Team 3NT S JH 7 100 -7 7 8 MORRISON Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2NT S JH 9 150 5 -5 9 ROUGHEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 2 N9H 7 50 -4 4 10 TALL Team 20 PROCTOR Team 2 N9H 8 110 0 0 11 STONEMAN Team 1 RIDLEY Team 2NT N 9H 7 50 -8 8 12 RYAN Team 2 KING Team 2 SJH 9 110 4 -4 13 MADSEN Team 3 VACHON Team 2 
EKC 8 90 -6 6 14 HARINGTON Team 4 PERRY Team 2 SJH 8 90 -1 1 15 ROBINSON Team 5 ROGERS Team 2 S4H 9 110 0 0 16 TUCKEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 1NT S JH 8 120 -2 2 17 PAULL Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 1NT E 4C 5 200 7 -7 18 LOVEDAY Team 8 MORRISON Team 3 S4H 8 50 -5 5 19 POWLEY Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 2 S4H 8 90 4 -4 20 PROCTOR Team 10 TALL Team 2 
W6D 7 100 0 0
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 6 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 1NT by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 2NT by NS | +2 | 180 | 1 |
| 2NT by NS | +1 | 150 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | +2 | 130 | 1 |
| 1NT by NS | +1 | 120 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | = | 110 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | +1 | 110 | 4 |
| 2 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | = | 90 | 2 |
| 2 by NS | -1 | -50 | 2 |
| 2NT by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | = | -90 | 1 |
| 3NT by NS | -2 | -100 | 1 |