NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 2
Board No: 10
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -270
Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 RIDLEY Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 4 E TS 10 620 -11 11 2 KING Team 3 VACHON Team 4 E JC 10 620 1 -1 3 VACHON Team 2 KING Team 4 E 5S 11 650 -1 1 4 PERRY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 N AH 10 620 16 -16 5 ROGERS Team 19 POWLEY Team 4 E TS 10 620 -12 12 6 MCDONALD Team 4 PERRY Team 4 E 3S 12 680 -16 16 7 MIDGLEY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 N AH 9 100 11 -11 8 MORRISON Team 10 TALL Team 5X N AH 10 200 -7 7 9 ROUGHEY Team 15 ROBINSON Team 4 N AH 9 100 3 -3 10 TALL Team 8 MORRISON Team 5 E TS 10 100 7 -7 11 STONEMAN Team 17 PAULL Team 4 N AH 10 620 11 -11 12 RYAN Team 13 MADSEN Team 5 N AH 9 200 -7 7 13 MADSEN Team 12 RYAN Team 5 E JC 10 100 7 -7 14 HARINGTON Team 16 TUCKEY Team 5 E TS 12 680 -11 11 15 ROBINSON Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 3 N AH 7 200 -3 3 16 TUCKEY Team 14 HARINGTON Team 4 N AH 9 100 11 -11 17 PAULL Team 11 STONEMAN Team 5 E TS 10 100 -11 11 18 LOVEDAY Team 20 PROCTOR Team 4 E TS 10 620 2 -2 19 POWLEY Team 5 ROGERS Team 5 E TS 10 100 12 -12 20 PROCTOR Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 4 E 3S 12 680 -2 2
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4 by NS | = | 620 | 2 |
5 by EW | -1 | 100 | 4 |
4 by NS | -1 | -100 | 3 |
3 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
5 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
5X by NS | -1 | -200 | 1 |
4 by EW | = | -620 | 4 |
4 by EW | +1 | -650 | 1 |
5 by EW | +1 | -680 | 1 |
4 by EW | +2 | -680 | 2 |