NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 2
Board No: 10
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -270
Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
7 MIDGLEY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 N AH 9 100 11 -11 3 VACHON Team 2 KING Team 4 E 5S 11 650 -1 1 2 KING Team 3 VACHON Team 4 E JC 10 620 1 -1 6 MCDONALD Team 4 PERRY Team 4 E 3S 12 680 -16 16 19 POWLEY Team 5 ROGERS Team 5 E TS 10 100 12 -12 4 PERRY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 N AH 10 620 16 -16 1 RIDLEY Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 4 E TS 10 620 -11 11 10 TALL Team 8 MORRISON Team 5 E TS 10 100 7 -7 15 ROBINSON Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 3 N AH 7 200 -3 3 8 MORRISON Team 10 TALL Team 5X N AH 10 200 -7 7 17 PAULL Team 11 STONEMAN Team 5 E TS 10 100 -11 11 13 MADSEN Team 12 RYAN Team 5 E JC 10 100 7 -7 12 RYAN Team 13 MADSEN Team 5 N AH 9 200 -7 7 16 TUCKEY Team 14 HARINGTON Team 4 N AH 9 100 11 -11 9 ROUGHEY Team 15 ROBINSON Team 4 N AH 9 100 3 -3 14 HARINGTON Team 16 TUCKEY Team 5 E TS 12 680 -11 11 11 STONEMAN Team 17 PAULL Team 4 N AH 10 620 11 -11 20 PROCTOR Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 4 E 3S 12 680 -2 2 5 ROGERS Team 19 POWLEY Team 4 E TS 10 620 -12 12 18 LOVEDAY Team 20 PROCTOR Team 4 E TS 10 620 2 -2
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4 by NS | = | 620 | 2 |
5 by EW | -1 | 100 | 4 |
4 by NS | -1 | -100 | 3 |
5 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
3 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
5X by NS | -1 | -200 | 1 |
4 by EW | = | -620 | 4 |
4 by EW | +1 | -650 | 1 |
5 by EW | +1 | -680 | 1 |
4 by EW | +2 | -680 | 2 |