NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 2
Board No: 10
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -270
Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
20 PROCTOR Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 4 E 3S 12 680 -2 2 14 HARINGTON Team 16 TUCKEY Team 5 E TS 12 680 -11 11 6 MCDONALD Team 4 PERRY Team 4 E 3S 12 680 -16 16 3 VACHON Team 2 KING Team 4 E 5S 11 650 -1 1 18 LOVEDAY Team 20 PROCTOR Team 4 E TS 10 620 2 -2 1 RIDLEY Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 4 E TS 10 620 -11 11 2 KING Team 3 VACHON Team 4 E JC 10 620 1 -1 5 ROGERS Team 19 POWLEY Team 4 E TS 10 620 -12 12 8 MORRISON Team 10 TALL Team 5X N AH 10 200 -7 7 15 ROBINSON Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 3 N AH 7 200 -3 3 12 RYAN Team 13 MADSEN Team 5 N AH 9 200 -7 7 16 TUCKEY Team 14 HARINGTON Team 4 N AH 9 100 11 -11 7 MIDGLEY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 N AH 9 100 11 -11 9 ROUGHEY Team 15 ROBINSON Team 4 N AH 9 100 3 -3 19 POWLEY Team 5 ROGERS Team 5 E TS 10 100 12 -12 10 TALL Team 8 MORRISON Team 5 E TS 10 100 7 -7 17 PAULL Team 11 STONEMAN Team 5 E TS 10 100 -11 11 13 MADSEN Team 12 RYAN Team 5 E JC 10 100 7 -7 4 PERRY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 N AH 10 620 16 -16 11 STONEMAN Team 17 PAULL Team 4 N AH 10 620 11 -11
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4 by NS | = | 620 | 2 |
5 by EW | -1 | 100 | 4 |
4 by NS | -1 | -100 | 3 |
5 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
3 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
5X by NS | -1 | -200 | 1 |
4 by EW | = | -620 | 4 |
4 by EW | +1 | -650 | 1 |
5 by EW | +1 | -680 | 1 |
4 by EW | +2 | -680 | 2 |