NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 19
Dealer: S, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -90
Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
16 TUCKEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 3 S 2S 7 100 -5 5 14 HARINGTON Team 20 PROCTOR Team 1NT N 3S 8 120 6 -6 15 ROBINSON Team 12 RYAN Team 2 W 5H 7 100 6 -6 13 MADSEN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 5 S 6S 7 200 -2 2 11 STONEMAN Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2 W 8D 7 100 6 -6 5 ROGERS Team 10 TALL Team 3X S AD 6 500 -7 7 2 KING Team 17 PAULL Team 3 S AD 8 50 3 -3 12 RYAN Team 15 ROBINSON Team 4 S AD 7 150 -6 6 8 MORRISON Team 3 VACHON Team 3 E AH 10 170 0 0 9 ROUGHEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 2 E AH 9 140 2 -2 17 PAULL Team 2 KING Team 3 E JD 9 140 -3 3 18 LOVEDAY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 3 E JD 9 140 -6 6 19 POWLEY Team 16 TUCKEY Team 3 E JD 8 100 5 -5 1 RIDLEY Team 4 PERRY Team 2 E JD 9 140 -6 6 7 MIDGLEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 3 E JD 9 140 -1 1 4 PERRY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 E JD 9 100 6 -6 3 VACHON Team 8 MORRISON Team 2 E JD 10 170 0 0 20 PROCTOR Team 14 HARINGTON Team 2 E JD 9 140 -6 6 6 MCDONALD Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 3 S KD 7 100 1 -1 10 TALL Team 5 ROGERS Team 2NT N KS 4 200 7 -7
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 19 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
1NT by NS | +1 | 120 | 1 |
3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
3 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
3 by NS | -2 | -100 | 2 |
3 by EW | = | -140 | 3 |
2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 3 |
4 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
3 by EW | +1 | -170 | 1 |
2 by EW | +2 | -170 | 1 |
2NT by NS | -4 | -200 | 1 |
5 by NS | -4 | -200 | 1 |
3X by NS | -3 | -500 | 1 |