NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 19
Dealer: S, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -90
Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
10 TALL Team 5 ROGERS Team 2NT N KS 4 200 7 -7 11 STONEMAN Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2 W 8D 7 100 6 -6 15 ROBINSON Team 12 RYAN Team 2 W 5H 7 100 6 -6 4 PERRY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 E JD 9 100 6 -6 14 HARINGTON Team 20 PROCTOR Team 1NT N 3S 8 120 6 -6 19 POWLEY Team 16 TUCKEY Team 3 E JD 8 100 5 -5 2 KING Team 17 PAULL Team 3 S AD 8 50 3 -3 9 ROUGHEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 2 E AH 9 140 2 -2 6 MCDONALD Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 3 S KD 7 100 1 -1 8 MORRISON Team 3 VACHON Team 3 E AH 10 170 0 0 3 VACHON Team 8 MORRISON Team 2 E JD 10 170 0 0 7 MIDGLEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 3 E JD 9 140 -1 1 13 MADSEN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 5 S 6S 7 200 -2 2 17 PAULL Team 2 KING Team 3 E JD 9 140 -3 3 16 TUCKEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 3 S 2S 7 100 -5 5 18 LOVEDAY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 3 E JD 9 140 -6 6 12 RYAN Team 15 ROBINSON Team 4 S AD 7 150 -6 6 1 RIDLEY Team 4 PERRY Team 2 E JD 9 140 -6 6 20 PROCTOR Team 14 HARINGTON Team 2 E JD 9 140 -6 6 5 ROGERS Team 10 TALL Team 3X S AD 6 500 -7 7
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 19 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
1NT by NS | +1 | 120 | 1 |
3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
3 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
3 by NS | -2 | -100 | 2 |
3 by EW | = | -140 | 3 |
2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 3 |
4 by NS | -3 | -150 | 1 |
3 by EW | +1 | -170 | 1 |
2 by EW | +2 | -170 | 1 |
2NT by NS | -4 | -200 | 1 |
5 by NS | -4 | -200 | 1 |
3X by NS | -3 | -500 | 1 |