NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 20
Dealer: W, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -280
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
20 PROCTOR Team 14 HARINGTON Team 2 E QD 10 170 0 0 14 HARINGTON Team 20 PROCTOR Team 2 E QD 10 170 0 0 13 MADSEN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 2 E QD 9 140 -6 6 11 STONEMAN Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 2 E QD 10 170 0 0 6 MCDONALD Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 2 E QD 9 140 10 -10 3 VACHON Team 8 MORRISON Team 2 E TD 10 170 10 -10 18 LOVEDAY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 3 E QD 10 170 0 0 2 KING Team 17 PAULL Team 3 E QD 8 100 12 -12 1 RIDLEY Team 4 PERRY Team 3 E QD 11 200 9 -9 12 RYAN Team 15 ROBINSON Team 3 E QD 10 170 -7 7 5 ROGERS Team 10 TALL Team 4 E QD 10 620 0 0 19 POWLEY Team 16 TUCKEY Team 4 E QD 9 100 12 -12 7 MIDGLEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 E QD 10 620 -10 10 17 PAULL Team 2 KING Team 4 E QD 10 620 -12 12 16 TUCKEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 4 E QD 10 620 -12 12 15 ROBINSON Team 12 RYAN Team 4 E QD 9 100 7 -7 8 MORRISON Team 3 VACHON Team 4 E QD 10 620 -10 10 9 ROUGHEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 4 E QD 9 100 6 -6 10 TALL Team 5 ROGERS Team 4 E QD 10 620 0 0 4 PERRY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 W QC 10 620 -9 9
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 3 |
2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 2 |
3 by EW | +1 | -170 | 2 |
2 by EW | +2 | -170 | 4 |
3 by EW | +2 | -200 | 1 |
4 by EW | = | -620 | 1 |
4 by EW | = | -620 | 6 |