NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 25
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -380
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 RIDLEY Team 4 PERRY Team 4 E 5S 9 100 12 -12 17 PAULL Team 2 KING Team 4 E AC 9 100 12 -12 20 PROCTOR Team 14 HARINGTON Team 4 E 2H 9 100 6 -6 10 TALL Team 5 ROGERS Team 4 E 8D 9 100 12 -12 9 ROUGHEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 4 E AC 9 100 12 -12 7 MIDGLEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 E 7D 9 100 12 -12 14 HARINGTON Team 20 PROCTOR Team 3 E 4C 9 140 -6 6 12 RYAN Team 15 ROBINSON Team 2 E 3D 9 140 11 -11 3 VACHON Team 8 MORRISON Team 3NT W 9D 9 600 1 -1 19 POWLEY Team 16 TUCKEY Team 4 E 8D 10 620 0 0 18 LOVEDAY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 4 E AC 10 620 0 0 6 MCDONALD Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 4 E 6H 10 620 -12 12 13 MADSEN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 4 E 8D 10 620 -12 12 4 PERRY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 E 6H 10 620 -12 12 5 ROGERS Team 10 TALL Team 4 E 7D 10 620 -12 12 8 MORRISON Team 3 VACHON Team 4 E AC 10 620 -1 1 11 STONEMAN Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 4 E 4D 10 620 0 0 16 TUCKEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 3NT W 4S 10 630 0 0 2 KING Team 17 PAULL Team 3NT W 9D 10 630 -12 12 15 ROBINSON Team 12 RYAN Team 4 E 7D 11 650 -11 11
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 6 |
3 by EW | = | -140 | 1 |
2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 1 |
3NT by EW | = | -600 | 1 |
4 by EW | = | -620 | 8 |
3NT by EW | +1 | -630 | 2 |
4 by EW | +1 | -650 | 1 |