NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 180
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
13 MADSEN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 4 N 9S 6 400 -14 14 14 HARINGTON Team 20 PROCTOR Team 3 S AC 11 200 8 -8 9 ROUGHEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 4 S AC 11 650 14 -14 15 ROBINSON Team 12 RYAN Team 4 S AC 9 100 -5 5 7 MIDGLEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 S AC 10 620 0 0 6 MCDONALD Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 4 S AC 10 620 0 0 4 PERRY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 S AC 9 100 0 0 18 LOVEDAY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 3 S AC 9 140 1 -1 19 POWLEY Team 16 TUCKEY Team 4 S AC 10 620 13 -13 1 RIDLEY Team 4 PERRY Team 4 S AC 9 100 0 0 17 PAULL Team 2 KING Team 3 W AD 9 140 -13 13 12 RYAN Team 15 ROBINSON Team 4 W AD 9 100 5 -5 11 STONEMAN Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 4 W AD 9 100 -1 1 8 MORRISON Team 3 VACHON Team 4 W AD 8 200 7 -7 5 ROGERS Team 10 TALL Team 4 W AD 7 300 -8 8 3 VACHON Team 8 MORRISON Team 3 W AD 9 110 -7 7 16 TUCKEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 3 W KD 9 140 -13 13 10 TALL Team 5 ROGERS Team 4 S KS 10 620 8 -8 2 KING Team 17 PAULL Team 4 S KS 10 620 13 -13 20 PROCTOR Team 14 HARINGTON Team 3 W TC 9 140 -8 8
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4 by NS | +1 | 650 | 1 |
4 by NS | = | 620 | 5 |
4 by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
4 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
3 by NS | +2 | 200 | 1 |
3 by NS | = | 140 | 1 |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 2 |
4 by NS | -1 | -100 | 3 |
3 by EW | = | -110 | 1 |
3 by EW | = | -140 | 3 |
4 by NS | -4 | -400 | 1 |