NOOSA WINTER TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 100
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
20 GODDARD Team 11 ROUGHLEY Team 3NT E 6C 10 630 -13 13 19 SMITH Team 17 MUSGRAVE Team 3NT E 4S 10 630 -13 13 14 QUIGLEY Team 9 WEBBER Team 3 W AS 10 130 -6 6 6 MALTBY Team 4 ANDREW Team 2NT E 8C 8 120 -6 6 16 MCNAMEE Team 7 HART Team 3 W 2C 9 110 -7 7 15 MIDGLEY Team 12 BECKETT Team 4 E 6D 9 100 -3 3 2 KELLY Team 8 OLSEN Team 4 W TC 9 100 0 0 4 ANDREW Team 6 MALTBY Team 3NT E 6D 8 100 6 -6 13 HAWKINS Team 18 HARRISON Team 2NT E 6H 7 100 -5 5 8 OLSEN Team 2 KELLY Team 3NT W 4D 8 100 0 0 9 WEBBER Team 14 QUIGLEY Team 2NT E 2S 7 100 6 -6 10 MCDONALD Team 3 JAKES Team 5 W 7C 10 100 -3 3 17 MUSGRAVE Team 19 SMITH Team 4 W 2C 8 200 13 -13 12 BECKETT Team 15 MIDGLEY Team 3NT E 6D 7 200 3 -3 11 ROUGHLEY Team 20 GODDARD Team 3NT E 4S 7 200 13 -13 3 JAKES Team 10 MCDONALD Team 5 W AS 9 200 3 -3 5 MELLINGS Team 1 HARRIS Team 3NT E 2H 7 200 -3 3 7 HART Team 16 MCNAMEE Team 3NT W 4S 7 200 7 -7 18 HARRISON Team 13 HAWKINS Team 4NT E 2S 7 300 5 -5 1 HARRIS Team 5 MELLINGS Team 3NT E 2H 6 300 3 -3
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4NT by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
3NT by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
3NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
3NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 3 |
4 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
5 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
5 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2NT by EW | -1 | 100 | 2 |
3NT by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
3NT by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
3 by EW | = | -110 | 1 |
2NT by EW | = | -120 | 1 |
3 by EW | +1 | -130 | 1 |
3NT by EW | +1 | -630 | 2 |