Boards Results

NATIONAL SENIORS' TEAMS - MATCH 5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 1
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
6 by EW	-3	150	1
7 by EW	-2	100	5
6 by EW	-1	50	1
6 by EW	-1	50	5
3X by NS	-1	-100	1
3 by EW	+2	-200	1
3X by NS	-2	-300	1
4 by EW	=	-420	1
5 by EW	=	-450	2
4 by EW	+1	-450	2
4 by EW	+1	-450	12
4 by EW	+2	-480	3
6 by EW	=	-980	1
6 by EW	=	-980	1
6 by EW	+1	-1010	1

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 KANETKAR Team	2 BUCHEN Team	5 W	3C	11		450	0	0
2 BUCHEN Team	1 KANETKAR Team	4 E	KD	11		450	0	0
3 SMOLANKO Team	11 HARMS Team	4 E	KD	11		450	-4	4
4 BURGESS Team	13 CRICHTON Team	6 E	JD	11	50		-2	2
5 LEIBOWITZ Team	28 STRONG Team	4 E	KD	12		480	11	-11
6 DE LUCA Team	23 MARTIN Team	6 E	KD	11	50		11	-11
7 FORDHAM Team	12 BLOOM Team	3X S	3C	8		100	8	-8
8 KLOFA Team	25 EMUL Team	6 E	JD	11	50		11	-11
9 HARLEY Team	15 CLARKE Team	4 E	KD	11		450	0	0
10 WATERS Team	14 HOOYKAAS Team	6 E	KD	11	50		-2	2
11 HARMS Team	3 SMOLANKO Team	3X S	AH	7		300	4	-4
12 BLOOM Team	7 FORDHAM Team	4 E	KD	11		450	-8	8
13 CRICHTON Team	4 BURGESS Team	7 E	KD	11	100		2	-2
14 HOOYKAAS Team	10 WATERS Team	7 E	KD	11	100		2	-2
15 CLARKE Team	9 HARLEY Team	4 E	KD	11		450	0	0
16 KAHLER Team	21 STRASSER Team	7 E	KD	11	100		11	-11
17 CHADWICK Team	27 VAN VUCHT Team	6 E	KD	12		980	-11	11
18 CALLANDER Team	32 HENDERSON Team	4 E	KD	11		450	0	0
19 SCUDDER Team	22 DIBLEY Team	4 E	QD	10		420	-11	11
20 FINIKIOTIS Team	35 VEARING Team	4 E	KD	11		450	-11	11
21 STRASSER Team	16 KAHLER Team	4 E	KD	11		450	-11	11
22 DIBLEY Team	19 SCUDDER Team	7 E	KD	11	100		11	-11
23 MARTIN Team	6 DE LUCA Team	5 W	6D	11		450	-11	11
24 WILKS Team	31 THORP Team	4 E	KD	11		450	-6	6
25 EMUL Team	8 KLOFA Team	4 E	KD	11		450	-11	11
26 BURICA Team	29 FRENCH Team	4 W	6D	11		450	11	-11
27 VAN VUCHT Team	17 CHADWICK Team	4 W	6D	11		450	11	-11
28 STRONG Team	5 LEIBOWITZ Team	6 W	TH	12		980	-11	11
29 FRENCH Team	26 BURICA Team	6 E	KD	13		1010	-11	11
30 KOWALCZYK Team	34 DAGLISH Team	4 E	KD	11		450	1	-1
31 THORP Team	24 WILKS Team	3 E	KD	11		200	6	-6
32 HENDERSON Team	18 CALLANDER Team	4 E	KD	11		450	0	0
33 GRIGG Team	38 KEELING Team	6 E	KD	9	150		3	-3
34 DAGLISH Team	30 KOWALCZYK Team	4 E	KD	12		480	-1	1
35 VEARING Team	20 FINIKIOTIS Team	6 W	6D	11	50		11	-11
36 YOUNG Team	37 GUNSON Team	7 E	KD	11	100		11	-11
37 GUNSON Team	36 YOUNG Team	4 E	KD	12		480	-11	11
38 KEELING Team	33 GRIGG Team	6 E	7C	11	50		-3	3