Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
14 SHU YANG Team	11 GARSIDE Team	2NT E	5H	10		180		-6	6
10 CARE Team	1 PAGE Team	1NT E	5H	9		150		0	0
1 PAGE Team	10 CARE Team	2NT E	5H	9		150		0	0
9 ROHRIG Team	4 KAROL Team	2NT E	5H	9		150		-6	6
2 RAMSUND Team	5 GIBBARDS Team	2NT W	JS	8		120		0	0
18 COLBERT Team	7 SAXBY Team	2NT E	5H	8		120		-6	6
17 TING Team	8 SHUTTLEWOOD Team	2NT E	5H	8		120		-5	5
16 EDGINTON Team	3 GIBSON Team	2NT E	5H	8		120		-6	6
15 GEORGEES Team	13 BURRIE Team	2NT E	5H	8		120		-5	5
12 LOVE Team	6 VAN KRUISTUM Team	2NT E	5H	8		120		-5	5
6 VAN KRUISTUM Team	12 LOVE Team	1 S	AH	7	70			5	-5
5 GIBBARDS Team	2 RAMSUND Team	2NT E	5H	8		120		0	0
4 KAROL Team	9 ROHRIG Team	2 N	5H	8	110			6	-6
11 GARSIDE Team	14 SHU YANG Team	2NT E	5H	7	50			6	-6
8 SHUTTLEWOOD Team	17 TING Team	2NT E	5H	7	50			5	-5
13 BURRIE Team	15 GEORGEES Team	3NT E	3C	8	50			5	-5
20 SANDERS Team	21 MCMAHON Team	2 W	5S	7	50			-3	3
22 BELL Team	19 CLARKE Team	2NT E	3C	7	50			-2	2
7 SAXBY Team	18 COLBERT Team	2NT E	5H	6	100			6	-6
3 GIBSON Team	16 EDGINTON Team	3NT E	QD	7	100			6	-6
19 CLARKE Team	22 BELL Team	2NT E	AS	6	100			2	-2
21 MCMAHON Team	20 SANDERS Team	3NT E	5H	6	150			3	-3

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Alternative display format