Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
28 EELES Team	13 WATSON Team	2 E	KH	9		140		0	0
24 BUTCHER Team	20 AVUNDUK Team	2 E	KH	8		110		2	-2
23 DE MARR Team	2 BARDON Team	2 E	KH	8		110		1	-1
20 AVUNDUK Team	24 BUTCHER Team	2 E	KH	10		170		-2	2
18 BAKER Team	11 ROUGHLEY Team	2 E	KH	8		110		-7	7
10 FREDERICKS Team	6 PERRY Team	2 E	KH	9		140		-8	8
17 BUCENS Team	26 COWLEY Team	2 E	9C	10		170		-7	7
5 ELLAWAY Team	1 CARTER Team	2 N	AS	3		500		-8	8
2 BARDON Team	23 DE MARR Team	3 E	9C	9		140		-1	1
27 ADAMS Team	14 HAWKINS Team	3 E	9C	8	100			-3	3
22 TYLER Team	21 BREENE Team	3 E	AD	8	100			-3	3
16 MORRISON Team	9 STONEMAN Team	3 E	AD	8	100			0	0
13 WATSON Team	28 EELES Team	3 E	9C	9		140		0	0
12 HARINGTON Team	3 SLATER Team	3 E	9C	9		140		2	-2
8 STRONG Team	7 RIDLEY Team	3 E	9C	8	100			9	-9
4 MCPHEAT Team	25 JENKINS Team	3 E	QH	8	100			12	-12
1 CARTER Team	5 ELLAWAY Team	3 E	QH	10		170		8	-8
3 SLATER Team	12 HARINGTON Team	4 S	9S	8		200		-2	2
14 HAWKINS Team	27 ADAMS Team	4 E	6C	8	200			3	-3
9 STONEMAN Team	16 MORRISON Team	4 E	9C	9	100			0	0
19 BAZZAN Team	15 WALSH Team	4 E	AD	8	200			9	-9
21 BREENE Team	22 TYLER Team	4 E	9C	8	200			3	-3
6 PERRY Team	10 FREDERICKS Team	4 E	9C	8	200			8	-8
25 JENKINS Team	4 MCPHEAT Team	4 E	KH	10		620		-12	12
26 COWLEY Team	17 BUCENS Team	4 E	9C	9	100			7	-7
11 ROUGHLEY Team	18 BAKER Team	4 W	AD	8	200			7	-7
15 WALSH Team	19 BAZZAN Team	5 S	9S	9		200		-9	9
7 RIDLEY Team	8 STRONG Team	5 S	9S	8		300		-9	9

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Alternative display format