Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
25 JENKINS Team	4 MCPHEAT Team	4 E	KH	10		620		-12	12
7 RIDLEY Team	8 STRONG Team	5 S	9S	8		300		-9	9
15 WALSH Team	19 BAZZAN Team	5 S	9S	9		200		-9	9
5 ELLAWAY Team	1 CARTER Team	2 N	AS	3		500		-8	8
10 FREDERICKS Team	6 PERRY Team	2 E	KH	9		140		-8	8
18 BAKER Team	11 ROUGHLEY Team	2 E	KH	8		110		-7	7
17 BUCENS Team	26 COWLEY Team	2 E	9C	10		170		-7	7
27 ADAMS Team	14 HAWKINS Team	3 E	9C	8	100			-3	3
22 TYLER Team	21 BREENE Team	3 E	AD	8	100			-3	3
3 SLATER Team	12 HARINGTON Team	4 S	9S	8		200		-2	2
20 AVUNDUK Team	24 BUTCHER Team	2 E	KH	10		170		-2	2
2 BARDON Team	23 DE MARR Team	3 E	9C	9		140		-1	1
13 WATSON Team	28 EELES Team	3 E	9C	9		140		0	0
16 MORRISON Team	9 STONEMAN Team	3 E	AD	8	100			0	0
9 STONEMAN Team	16 MORRISON Team	4 E	9C	9	100			0	0
28 EELES Team	13 WATSON Team	2 E	KH	9		140		0	0
23 DE MARR Team	2 BARDON Team	2 E	KH	8		110		1	-1
12 HARINGTON Team	3 SLATER Team	3 E	9C	9		140		2	-2
24 BUTCHER Team	20 AVUNDUK Team	2 E	KH	8		110		2	-2
14 HAWKINS Team	27 ADAMS Team	4 E	6C	8	200			3	-3
21 BREENE Team	22 TYLER Team	4 E	9C	8	200			3	-3
11 ROUGHLEY Team	18 BAKER Team	4 W	AD	8	200			7	-7
26 COWLEY Team	17 BUCENS Team	4 E	9C	9	100			7	-7
6 PERRY Team	10 FREDERICKS Team	4 E	9C	8	200			8	-8
1 CARTER Team	5 ELLAWAY Team	3 E	QH	10		170		8	-8
19 BAZZAN Team	15 WALSH Team	4 E	AD	8	200			9	-9
8 STRONG Team	7 RIDLEY Team	3 E	9C	8	100			9	-9
4 MCPHEAT Team	25 JENKINS Team	3 E	QH	8	100			12	-12

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Alternative display format