Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
25 JENKINS Team	4 MCPHEAT Team	3NT S	JD	7		100		-11	11
23 DE MARR Team	2 BARDON Team	3NT S	JD	8		50		-10	10
19 BAZZAN Team	15 WALSH Team	2NT S	JD	7		50		-6	6
16 MORRISON Team	9 STONEMAN Team	2NT S	JD	7		50		0	0
21 BREENE Team	22 TYLER Team	3NT S	JD	8		50		-5	5
11 ROUGHLEY Team	18 BAKER Team	3NT S	8C	8		50		-10	10
9 STONEMAN Team	16 MORRISON Team	3NT S	JD	8		50		0	0
26 COWLEY Team	17 BUCENS Team	3NT S	JD	8		50		-5	5
27 ADAMS Team	14 HAWKINS Team	3NT S	JD	8		50		-6	6
5 ELLAWAY Team	1 CARTER Team	2 E	TH	6	100			-3	3
22 TYLER Team	21 BREENE Team	2 N	9C	9	140			5	-5
17 BUCENS Team	26 COWLEY Team	3 N	3S	9	140			5	-5
8 STRONG Team	7 RIDLEY Team	2 N	9C	10	170			-7	7
6 PERRY Team	10 FREDERICKS Team	2 N	9C	10	170			-6	6
12 HARINGTON Team	3 SLATER Team	2 N	9C	10	170			-6	6
14 HAWKINS Team	27 ADAMS Team	3 N	6C	10	170			6	-6
28 EELES Team	13 WATSON Team	2 N	AD	10	170			-7	7
15 WALSH Team	19 BAZZAN Team	2 N	5C	11	200			6	-6
20 AVUNDUK Team	24 BUTCHER Team	3 N	9C	11	200			-6	6
1 CARTER Team	5 ELLAWAY Team	2 N	9C	11	200			3	-3
18 BAKER Team	11 ROUGHLEY Team	4 N	9C	10	420			10	-10
24 BUTCHER Team	20 AVUNDUK Team	4 N	9C	10	420			6	-6
4 MCPHEAT Team	25 JENKINS Team	4 N	5C	10	420			11	-11
2 BARDON Team	23 DE MARR Team	4 N	9C	10	420			10	-10
10 FREDERICKS Team	6 PERRY Team	3NT S	JD	10	430			6	-6
3 SLATER Team	12 HARINGTON Team	3NT S	3C	10	430			6	-6
13 WATSON Team	28 EELES Team	3NT S	6C	11	460			7	-7
7 RIDLEY Team	8 STRONG Team	3NT S	6C	11	460			7	-7

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Alternative display format