Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA NOVICE TEAMS 2012 - MATCH 2

Board No: 16
Dealer: W, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -530

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

16 ELICH Team 1 POWELL Team 5 W CA 11 650 -10 10

15 LONG Team 2 FENAUGHTY Team 4 E CJ 11 650 -1 1

18 POWER Team 3 HASLAM Team 4 W CA 11 650 -1 1

13 FILBEE Team 4 CLARK Team Adjusted score 0 0

12 BRADLEY Team 5 REYNOLDS Team 4 E C8 11 650 -13 13

8 BLENCOE Team 6 MCDOUGALL Team 6NT E D7 11 100 12 -12

14 DALRYMPLE Team 7 JENKIN Team 3NT W C6 12 690 -1 1

6 MCDOUGALL Team 8 BLENCOE Team 4 W C5 10 620 -12 12

11 SWINSON Team 10 LEY Team 3NT E H7 11 660 -13 13

5 REYNOLDS Team 12 BRADLEY Team 6NT E D7 10 200 13 -13

4 CLARK Team 13 FILBEE Team 2 W H2 10 170 0 0

7 JENKIN Team 14 DALRYMPLE Team 3NT W C5 11 660 1 -1

2 FENAUGHTY Team 15 LONG Team 3NT E D7 10 630 1 -1

1 POWELL Team 16 ELICH Team 1NT E D7 10 180 10 -10

19 SPENCE Team 17 CHEESMAN Team 4 W C9 10 620 -12 12

3 HASLAM Team 18 POWER Team 4 W DQ 10 620 1 -1

17 CHEESMAN Team 19 SPENCE Team 4 E C7 9 100 12 -12

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16
Contract Result Score Frequency
6NT by EW -2 200 1
6NT by EW -1 100 1
4 by EW -1 100 1
2 by EW +2 -170 1
1NT by EW +3 -180 1
4 by EW = -620 3
3NT by EW +1 -630 1
5 by EW = -650 1
4 by EW +1 -650 2
4 by EW +1 -650 1
3NT by EW +2 -660 1
3NT by EW +2 -660 1
3NT by EW +3 -690 1
= 0 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
16 ELICH Team	1 POWELL Team	5 W	CA	11		650	-10	10
15 LONG Team	2 FENAUGHTY Team	4 E	CJ	11		650	-1	1
18 POWER Team	3 HASLAM Team	4 W	CA	11		650	-1	1
13 FILBEE Team	4 CLARK Team				Adjusted score		0	0
12 BRADLEY Team	5 REYNOLDS Team	4 E	C8	11		650	-13	13
8 BLENCOE Team	6 MCDOUGALL Team	6NT E	D7	11	100		12	-12
14 DALRYMPLE Team	7 JENKIN Team	3NT W	C6	12		690	-1	1
6 MCDOUGALL Team	8 BLENCOE Team	4 W	C5	10		620	-12	12
11 SWINSON Team	10 LEY Team	3NT E	H7	11		660	-13	13
5 REYNOLDS Team	12 BRADLEY Team	6NT E	D7	10	200		13	-13
4 CLARK Team	13 FILBEE Team	2 W	H2	10		170	0	0
7 JENKIN Team	14 DALRYMPLE Team	3NT W	C5	11		660	1	-1
2 FENAUGHTY Team	15 LONG Team	3NT E	D7	10		630	1	-1
1 POWELL Team	16 ELICH Team	1NT E	D7	10		180	10	-10
19 SPENCE Team	17 CHEESMAN Team	4 W	C9	10		620	-12	12
3 HASLAM Team	18 POWER Team	4 W	DQ	10		620	1	-1
17 CHEESMAN Team	19 SPENCE Team	4 E	C7	9	100		12	-12

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
6NT by EW	-2	200	1
6NT by EW	-1	100	1
4 by EW	-1	100	1
2 by EW	+2	-170	1
1NT by EW	+3	-180	1
4 by EW	=	-620	3
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
5 by EW	=	-650	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	2
4 by EW	+1	-650	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1
3NT by EW	+3	-690	1
	=	0	1