Boards Results

RESTRICTED SWISS TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 16
Dealer: W, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -500

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 STRUTTON Team 6 SHARDLOW Team 4 W 8C 10 620 3 -3

2 BLACKMAN Team 17 COLLINS Team 4 W 8C 13 710 -3 3

3 DELANEY Team 16 RODGERS Team 6 W 8C 12 1430 -12 12

4 AVUNDUK Team 14 BISHOP Team 4 W 8C 13 710 0 0

5 WEBBER Team 9 CONROY Team 4 E 8C 12 680 -1 1

6 SHARDLOW Team 1 STRUTTON Team 5 W 8C 13 710 -3 3

7 CLUFF Team 13 NICE Team 5 W 8C 8 300 18 -18

8 DAWSON Team 15 CRAWFORD Team 4 E 5H 9 100 -3 3

9 CONROY Team 5 WEBBER Team 4 W 8C 11 650 1 -1

10 DEL PAPA Team 18 CARE Team 4 W 8C 10 620 -12 12

11 GOODCHILD Team 12 NORTH Team 6 W 8C 10 200 14 -14

12 NORTH Team 11 GOODCHILD Team 4 W 8C 13 710 -14 14

13 NICE Team 7 CLUFF Team 6 W 8C 13 1460 -18 18

14 BISHOP Team 4 AVUNDUK Team 4 W 8C 13 710 0 0

15 CRAWFORD Team 8 DAWSON Team 4 W 8C 8 200 3 -3

16 RODGERS Team 3 DELANEY Team 4 W 8C 13 710 12 -12

17 COLLINS Team 2 BLACKMAN Team 4 W 8C 10 620 3 -3

18 CARE Team 10 DEL PAPA Team 5 W 8C 10 100 12 -12

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW -3 300 1
6 by EW -2 200 1
4 by EW -2 200 1
4 by EW -1 100 1
5 by EW -1 100 1
4 by EW = -620 3
4 by EW +1 -650 1
4 by EW +2 -680 1
5 by EW +2 -710 1
4 by EW +3 -710 5
6 by EW = -1430 1
6 by EW +1 -1460 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 STRUTTON Team	6 SHARDLOW Team	4 W	8C	10		620	3	-3
2 BLACKMAN Team	17 COLLINS Team	4 W	8C	13		710	-3	3
3 DELANEY Team	16 RODGERS Team	6 W	8C	12		1430	-12	12
4 AVUNDUK Team	14 BISHOP Team	4 W	8C	13		710	0	0
5 WEBBER Team	9 CONROY Team	4 E	8C	12		680	-1	1
6 SHARDLOW Team	1 STRUTTON Team	5 W	8C	13		710	-3	3
7 CLUFF Team	13 NICE Team	5 W	8C	8	300		18	-18
8 DAWSON Team	15 CRAWFORD Team	4 E	5H	9	100		-3	3
9 CONROY Team	5 WEBBER Team	4 W	8C	11		650	1	-1
10 DEL PAPA Team	18 CARE Team	4 W	8C	10		620	-12	12
11 GOODCHILD Team	12 NORTH Team	6 W	8C	10	200		14	-14
12 NORTH Team	11 GOODCHILD Team	4 W	8C	13		710	-14	14
13 NICE Team	7 CLUFF Team	6 W	8C	13		1460	-18	18
14 BISHOP Team	4 AVUNDUK Team	4 W	8C	13		710	0	0
15 CRAWFORD Team	8 DAWSON Team	4 W	8C	8	200		3	-3
16 RODGERS Team	3 DELANEY Team	4 W	8C	13		710	12	-12
17 COLLINS Team	2 BLACKMAN Team	4 W	8C	10		620	3	-3
18 CARE Team	10 DEL PAPA Team	5 W	8C	10	100		12	-12

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	-3	300	1
6 by EW	-2	200	1
4 by EW	-2	200	1
4 by EW	-1	100	1
5 by EW	-1	100	1
4 by EW	=	-620	3
4 by EW	+1	-650	1
4 by EW	+2	-680	1
5 by EW	+2	-710	1
4 by EW	+3	-710	5
6 by EW	=	-1430	1
6 by EW	+1	-1460	1