Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
3 ROBSON Team	31 PESCATORE Team	5 S	2C	11	450			13	-13
1 PARKER Team	20 TAYLOR Team	4 S	2H	11	450			8	-8
21 WILKINSON Team	4 CARTER Team	5 S	2H	11	450			-1	1
23 CUTMORE Team	29 MATTHEW Team	5 S	2H	11	450			0	0
24 PEARCE Team	19 STEINHARDT Team	5X S	2H	11	650			5	-5
9 MOSES Team	10 STRONG Team	4 S	2H	11	450			0	0
29 MATTHEW Team	23 CUTMORE Team	4 S	3H	11	450			0	0
4 CARTER Team	21 WILKINSON Team	5 S	3H	12	480			1	-1
12 FOX Team	5 JACKMAN Team	5 S	4C	11	450			0	0
15 LONGFORD Team	7 LEE Team	5 N	4C	11	450			8	-8
5 JACKMAN Team	12 FOX Team	4 S	4S	11	450			0	0
32 VAN BEEST Team	30 HOLMES Team	3 N	6H	11	200			-7	7
10 STRONG Team	9 MOSES Team	5 S	6H	11	450			0	0
18 STONEMAN Team	8 AFFLICK Team	5 S	6H	11	450			8	-8
8 AFFLICK Team	18 STONEMAN Team	5 E	7C	9	100			-8	8
13 ACKLIN Team	14 RYAN Team	5 W	7C	10	50			-4	4
20 TAYLOR Team	1 PARKER Team	5 E	7C	9	100			-8	8
26 BUTLER Team	11 SCHOUTROP Team	5 E	AD	8	150			-8	8
25 GOSNEY Team	6 TUCKER Team	5 E	AD	10	50			-10	10
31 PESCATORE Team	3 ROBSON Team	4 E	AS	10		420		-13	13
2 LUCK Team	16 DAWSON Team	5 E	AS	9	100			-9	9
14 RYAN Team	13 ACKLIN Team	5 E	AS	7	200			4	-4
7 LEE Team	15 LONGFORD Team	5 E	AS	9	100			-8	8
19 STEINHARDT Team	24 PEARCE Team	4 N	QD	11	450			-5	5
16 DAWSON Team	2 LUCK Team	5 S	QD	12	480			9	-9
22 ROONEY Team	28 BROADLEY Team	5 S	QH	11	450			0	0
17 RUNTING Team	27 DICKERSON Team	5 S	QH	12	480			-5	5
27 DICKERSON Team	17 RUNTING Team	5X S	QH	11	650			5	-5
28 BROADLEY Team	22 ROONEY Team	4 S	QH	11	450			0	0
11 SCHOUTROP Team	26 BUTLER Team	4 S	QH	12	480			8	-8
30 HOLMES Team	32 VAN BEEST Team	4 S	QH	12	480			7	-7
6 TUCKER Team	25 GOSNEY Team	5 S	QH	12	480			10	-10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Alternative display format