Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
7 NIGHTINGALE Team	1 MILWARD Team	6 N		11		100		-13	13
10 SWANSON Team	13 STAINES Team	6 N		11		100		-12	12
11 DE MESTRE Team	4 STRONG Team	3 N		11	150			-10	10
15 RAWARD Team	16 SHAW Team	2 N		11	150			-1	1
16 SHAW Team	15 RAWARD Team	3 N		12	170			1	-1
8 BOGATIE Team	6 HORSFIELD Team	5 N		11	600			-3	3
12 FLETCHER Team	3 HOWARD Team	5 N		11	600			-2	2
14 CHOTAI Team	9 SEAR Team	5 N		11	600			-2	2
4 STRONG Team	11 DE MESTRE Team	3NT N		10	630			10	-10
13 STAINES Team	10 SWANSON Team	3NT N		10	630			12	-12
1 MILWARD Team	7 NIGHTINGALE Team	3NT N		11	660			13	-13
3 HOWARD Team	12 FLETCHER Team	3NT N		11	660			2	-2
5 MILLAR Team	2 BERGER Team	3NT N		11	660			-1	1
9 SEAR Team	14 CHOTAI Team	3NT N		11	660			2	-2
2 BERGER Team	5 MILLAR Team	3NT N		12	690			1	-1
6 HORSFIELD Team	8 BOGATIE Team	3NT N		12	690			3	-3

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 18
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+3	690	2
3NT by NS	+2	660	4
3NT by NS	+1	630	2
5 by NS	=	600	3
3 by NS	+3	170	1
3 by NS	+2	150	1
2 by NS	+3	150	1
6 by NS	-1	-100	2

Alternative display format