Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
15 HOMIK Team	6 STRONG Team	4 S		11	450			0	0
28 OWENS Team	19 ATKINSON Team	2 S		7		50		-11	11
27 HODGES Team	21 BULLOCK Team	4X E		6	1100			12	-12
26 STAINES Team	22 PIDDINGTON Team	4 S		10	420			5	-5
25 HARVEY-KELLY Team	2 WEATHERED Team	4 S		11	450			6	-6
24 RAWARD Team	4 JACKMAN Team	4 S		10	420			0	0
23 CHESSER Team	5 TUXWORTH Team	4 N		11	450			0	0
22 PIDDINGTON Team	26 STAINES Team	2NT N		11	210			-5	5
21 BULLOCK Team	27 HODGES Team	4 S		10	420			-12	12
20 TILLOTSON Team	10 REID Team	4 S		10	420			-1	1
19 ATKINSON Team	28 OWENS Team	4 S		11	450			11	-11
18 MOSCHNER Team	8 JOHNSON Team	4 S		8		100		-11	11
17 ZELLER Team	9 BOLT Team	4 S		11	450			0	0
16 KABLE Team	11 MILLAR Team	4 N		9		50		-10	10
1 BRAITHWAITE Team	12 SCHOEN Team	4 S		11	450			1	-1
14 CAMPBELL Team	7 LUCK Team	4 S		11	450			7	-7
13 NIGHTINGALE Team	3 STEINWEDEL Team	4 S		10	420			-9	9
12 SCHOEN Team	1 BRAITHWAITE Team	4 S		10	420			-1	1
11 MILLAR Team	16 KABLE Team	4 S		10	420			10	-10
10 REID Team	20 TILLOTSON Team	4 S		11	450			1	-1
9 BOLT Team	17 ZELLER Team	4 S		11	450			0	0
8 JOHNSON Team	18 MOSCHNER Team	4 S		10	420			11	-11
7 LUCK Team	14 CAMPBELL Team	3 S		10	170			-7	7
6 STRONG Team	15 HOMIK Team	4 S		11	450			0	0
5 TUXWORTH Team	23 CHESSER Team	4 S		11	450			0	0
4 JACKMAN Team	24 RAWARD Team	4 S		10	420			0	0
3 STEINWEDEL Team	13 NIGHTINGALE Team	2X W		5	800			9	-9
2 WEATHERED Team	25 HARVEY-KELLY Team	3 S		11	200			-6	6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Alternative display format