Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
21 JENKIN Team	5 PARKER Team	3NT E		6	300			9	-9
7 COLLINS Team	12 LOVETT Team	4 E		7	300			9	-9
3 SYKES Team	11 NILSSON Team	3 W		7	200			7	-7
15 LU Team	17 GOODWIN Team	3 E		7	200			3	-3
23 FINIGAN Team	6 LACHMAN Team	3 W		7	200			2	-2
25 MUKAI Team	8 STRONG Team	3 E		7	200			7	-7
19 PALETHORPE Team	24 CROOKALL Team	3 S		10	170			1	-1
20 CHAN Team	22 MOSS Team	2 S		9	140			1	-1
18 EBERHARDT Team	16 CLOSE Team	3 S		9	140			6	-6
14 WOOLER Team	9 THOMAS Team	2 S		9	140			0	0
24 CROOKALL Team	19 PALETHORPE Team	3 S		9	140			-1	1
10 SCHOEN Team	1 FRANCIS Team	3 S		9	140			6	-6
9 THOMAS Team	14 WOOLER Team	3 S		9	140			0	0
6 LACHMAN Team	23 FINIGAN Team	3 S		9	140			-2	2
28 FAWCETT Team	27 BARNES Team	3 S		9	140			6	-6
29 SPELMAN Team	30 HEARD Team	3 S		9	140			1	-1
26 PARKES Team	13 SALTER Team	2 S		8	110			5	-5
22 MOSS Team	20 CHAN Team	2 S		8	110			-1	1
30 HEARD Team	29 SPELMAN Team	3 E		8	100			-1	1
2 ROBSON Team	4 MARTIN Team	1NT E		6	100			0	0
17 GOODWIN Team	15 LU Team	3 E		8	100			-3	3
4 MARTIN Team	2 ROBSON Team	3 E		8	100			0	0
13 SALTER Team	26 PARKES Team	2 E		8		90		-5	5
8 STRONG Team	25 MUKAI Team	2 E		8		90		-7	7
16 CLOSE Team	18 EBERHARDT Team	3 S		8		100		-6	6
12 LOVETT Team	7 COLLINS Team	3 S		8		100		-9	9
11 NILSSON Team	3 SYKES Team	3 S		8		100		-7	7
1 FRANCIS Team	10 SCHOEN Team	3 S		8		100		-6	6
27 BARNES Team	28 FAWCETT Team	3 E		9		110		-6	6
5 PARKER Team	21 JENKIN Team	3 E		9		110		-9	9

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Alternative display format