NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 6
Board No: 20
Dealer: W, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -60
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
20 PROCTOR Team 16 TUCKEY Team 2NT E 9D 10 180 -7 7 2 KING Team 11 STONEMAN Team 1NT S QS 8 120 -2 2 16 TUCKEY Team 20 PROCTOR Team 3 N TH 10 130 7 -7 5 ROGERS Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 3 N TH 9 110 5 -5 18 LOVEDAY Team 13 MADSEN Team 2 S QS 8 90 9 -9 3 VACHON Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 3 N TH 9 110 9 -9 10 TALL Team 4 PERRY Team 4 N TH 10 130 6 -6 1 RIDLEY Team 15 ROBINSON Team 3NT S QS 8 100 0 0 4 PERRY Team 10 TALL Team 2 S AH 7 100 -6 6 17 PAULL Team 6 MCDONALD Team 2 W KC 7 100 11 -11 15 ROBINSON Team 1 RIDLEY Team 3 N TH 8 100 0 0 9 ROUGHEY Team 5 ROGERS Team 2 S QS 7 100 -5 5 14 HARINGTON Team 8 MORRISON Team 3 W KC 7 200 12 -12 11 STONEMAN Team 2 KING Team 2 W KC 6 200 2 -2 19 POWLEY Team 12 RYAN Team 3NT S QS 7 200 3 -3 12 RYAN Team 19 POWLEY Team 3NT S QH 6 300 -3 3 13 MADSEN Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 3 S AH 6 300 -9 9 7 MIDGLEY Team 3 VACHON Team 2 S QS 5 300 -9 9 8 MORRISON Team 14 HARINGTON Team 3NT S QS 5 400 -12 12 6 MCDONALD Team 17 PAULL Team 3 S QS 5 400 -11 11
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 20 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
2 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
3 by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
4 by NS | = | 130 | 1 |
3 by NS | +1 | 130 | 1 |
1NT by NS | +1 | 120 | 1 |
3 by NS | = | 110 | 2 |
2 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
2 by NS | = | 90 | 1 |
2 by NS | -1 | -100 | 2 |
3NT by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |
3 by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |
2NT by EW | +2 | -180 | 1 |
3NT by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
3 by NS | -3 | -300 | 1 |
3NT by NS | -3 | -300 | 1 |
2 by NS | -3 | -300 | 1 |
3NT by NS | -4 | -400 | 1 |
3 by NS | -4 | -400 | 1 |