Boards Results

NOOSA WINTER TEAMS - MATCH 3

Board No: 22
Dealer: E, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 30

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

19 SMITH Team 17 MUSGRAVE Team 1 N 2C 9 140 -4 4

17 MUSGRAVE Team 19 SMITH Team 4 E 2D 7 300 4 -4

14 QUIGLEY Team 9 WEBBER Team 2 E 2D 8 110 -6 6

12 BECKETT Team 15 MIDGLEY Team 3 E 2D 8 100 -3 3

9 WEBBER Team 14 QUIGLEY Team 2 N 3C 9 140 6 -6

8 OLSEN Team 2 KELLY Team 3 E 3S 9 140 -1 1

1 HARRIS Team 5 MELLINGS Team 2 E 4D 9 140 -7 7

6 MALTBY Team 4 ANDREW Team 4 E 4D 7 300 8 -8

11 ROUGHLEY Team 20 GODDARD Team 3 E 4D 8 100 6 -6

18 HARRISON Team 13 HAWKINS Team 2 E 5D 8 110 -1 1

2 KELLY Team 8 OLSEN Team 2 E 6D 8 110 1 -1

20 GODDARD Team 11 ROUGHLEY Team 3 E 8C 9 140 -6 6

13 HAWKINS Team 18 HARRISON Team 2 W AD 8 90 1 -1

15 MIDGLEY Team 12 BECKETT Team 4 E AS 8 200 3 -3

16 MCNAMEE Team 7 HART Team 3 W KD 10 130 -7 7

10 MCDONALD Team 3 JAKES Team 2 S KH 8 110 -1 1

7 HART Team 16 MCNAMEE Team 2 S KH 9 140 7 -7

5 MELLINGS Team 1 HARRIS Team 3 S KH 9 140 7 -7

4 ANDREW Team 6 MALTBY Team 3 S KH 8 50 -8 8

3 JAKES Team 10 MCDONALD Team 3 S KH 9 140 1 -1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -3 300 2
4 by EW -2 200 1
3 by NS = 140 2
2 by NS +1 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 1
1 by NS +2 140 1
2 by NS = 110 1
3 by EW -1 100 2
3 by NS -1 -50 1
2 by EW = -90 1
2 by EW = -110 3
3 by EW +1 -130 1
3 by EW = -140 2
2 by EW +1 -140 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
19 SMITH Team	17 MUSGRAVE Team	1 N	2C	9	140		-4	4
17 MUSGRAVE Team	19 SMITH Team	4 E	2D	7	300		4	-4
14 QUIGLEY Team	9 WEBBER Team	2 E	2D	8		110	-6	6
12 BECKETT Team	15 MIDGLEY Team	3 E	2D	8	100		-3	3
9 WEBBER Team	14 QUIGLEY Team	2 N	3C	9	140		6	-6
8 OLSEN Team	2 KELLY Team	3 E	3S	9		140	-1	1
1 HARRIS Team	5 MELLINGS Team	2 E	4D	9		140	-7	7
6 MALTBY Team	4 ANDREW Team	4 E	4D	7	300		8	-8
11 ROUGHLEY Team	20 GODDARD Team	3 E	4D	8	100		6	-6
18 HARRISON Team	13 HAWKINS Team	2 E	5D	8		110	-1	1
2 KELLY Team	8 OLSEN Team	2 E	6D	8		110	1	-1
20 GODDARD Team	11 ROUGHLEY Team	3 E	8C	9		140	-6	6
13 HAWKINS Team	18 HARRISON Team	2 W	AD	8		90	1	-1
15 MIDGLEY Team	12 BECKETT Team	4 E	AS	8	200		3	-3
16 MCNAMEE Team	7 HART Team	3 W	KD	10		130	-7	7
10 MCDONALD Team	3 JAKES Team	2 S	KH	8	110		-1	1
7 HART Team	16 MCNAMEE Team	2 S	KH	9	140		7	-7
5 MELLINGS Team	1 HARRIS Team	3 S	KH	9	140		7	-7
4 ANDREW Team	6 MALTBY Team	3 S	KH	8		50	-8	8
3 JAKES Team	10 MCDONALD Team	3 S	KH	9	140		1	-1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-3	300	2
4 by EW	-2	200	1
3 by NS	=	140	2
2 by NS	+1	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	1
1 by NS	+2	140	1
2 by NS	=	110	1
3 by EW	-1	100	2
3 by NS	-1	-50	1
2 by EW	=	-90	1
2 by EW	=	-110	3
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
3 by EW	=	-140	2
2 by EW	+1	-140	1