Boards Results

REDLAND TEAMS 2013 C GRADE - MATCH 6

Board No: 23
Dealer: S, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -440

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

7 FULCHER Team 4 GLASBY Team 4 W 2D 9 100 13 -13

2 BENES Team 9 LOCK Team 2 E QD 11 200 10 -10

6 SULLIVAN Team 10 PEGG Team 4 E 7C 8 200 3 -3

1 NISHIGAMI Team 3 FRAMPTON Team 4 W 7S 10 620 1 -1

5 BESSELL Team 8 KENNEDY Team 4 W 9D 10 620 1 -1

3 FRAMPTON Team 1 NISHIGAMI Team 4 W AC 11 650 -1 1

8 KENNEDY Team 5 BESSELL Team 4 W AC 11 650 -1 1

10 PEGG Team 6 SULLIVAN Team 4 W 2C 9 100 -3 3

9 LOCK Team 2 BENES Team 4 W 3D 11 650 -10 10

4 GLASBY Team 7 FULCHER Team 4 W AC 11 650 -13 13

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Hand record file name not recorded

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 23
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -2 200 1
4 by EW -1 100 2
2 by EW +3 -200 1
4 by EW = -620 2
4 by EW +1 -650 4

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
7 FULCHER Team	4 GLASBY Team	4 W	2D	9	100		13	-13
2 BENES Team	9 LOCK Team	2 E	QD	11		200	10	-10
6 SULLIVAN Team	10 PEGG Team	4 E	7C	8	200		3	-3
1 NISHIGAMI Team	3 FRAMPTON Team	4 W	7S	10		620	1	-1
5 BESSELL Team	8 KENNEDY Team	4 W	9D	10		620	1	-1
3 FRAMPTON Team	1 NISHIGAMI Team	4 W	AC	11		650	-1	1
8 KENNEDY Team	5 BESSELL Team	4 W	AC	11		650	-1	1
10 PEGG Team	6 SULLIVAN Team	4 W	2C	9	100		-3	3
9 LOCK Team	2 BENES Team	4 W	3D	11		650	-10	10
4 GLASBY Team	7 FULCHER Team	4 W	AC	11		650	-13	13

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 23
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-2	200	1
4 by EW	-1	100	2
2 by EW	+3	-200	1
4 by EW	=	-620	2
4 by EW	+1	-650	4