REDLAND TEAMS 2013 A GRADE - MATCH 6
Board No: 24
Dealer: W, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 50
| Teams | Score | Imps | ||||||||
| North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | Tricks | NS | EW | NS | EW | ||
| 10 KASZUBSKI Team | 8 HALFORD Team | 4 W | 5S | 10 | 420 | -9 | 9 | |||
| 2 TRELOAR Team | 5 SCHOEN Team | 5 E | AS | 10 | 50 | -3 | 3 | |||
| 9 ROLAND Team | 11 LEHMANN Team | 5 S | 2S | 10 | 50 | -3 | 3 | |||
| 7 THOMAS Team | 12 BUCENS Team | 5 E | 4C | 10 | 50 | -2 | 2 | |||
| 4 KEMPTHORNE Team | 1 WALLIS Team | 3 S | 3S | 10 | 130 | -1 | 1 | |||
| 3 AFFLICK Team | 6 BACK Team | 4 W | QD | 9 | 50 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 6 BACK Team | 3 AFFLICK Team | 4 E | AS | 9 | 50 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 WALLIS Team | 4 KEMPTHORNE Team | 3 N | 2D | 11 | 150 | 1 | -1 | |||
| 12 BUCENS Team | 7 THOMAS Team | 5 W | QC | 9 | 100 | 2 | -2 | |||
| 5 SCHOEN Team | 2 TRELOAR Team | 4 S | 4D | 11 | 150 | 3 | -3 | |||
| 11 LEHMANN Team | 9 ROLAND Team | 4 W | QC | 9 | 50 | 3 | -3 | |||
| 8 HALFORD Team | 10 KASZUBSKI Team | 5 S | 2D | 10 | 50 | 9 | -9 | |||
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 4 by NS | +1 | 150 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | +2 | 150 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | +1 | 130 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | -2 | 100 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | -1 | 50 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
| 5 by NS | -1 | -50 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | = | -420 | 1 |