REDLAND TEAMS 2013 A GRADE - MATCH 6
Board No: 24
Dealer: W, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 50
| Teams | Score | Imps | ||||||||
| North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | Tricks | NS | EW | NS | EW | ||
| 1 WALLIS Team | 4 KEMPTHORNE Team | 3 N | 2D | 11 | 150 | 1 | -1 | |||
| 8 HALFORD Team | 10 KASZUBSKI Team | 5 S | 2D | 10 | 50 | 9 | -9 | |||
| 9 ROLAND Team | 11 LEHMANN Team | 5 S | 2S | 10 | 50 | -3 | 3 | |||
| 4 KEMPTHORNE Team | 1 WALLIS Team | 3 S | 3S | 10 | 130 | -1 | 1 | |||
| 7 THOMAS Team | 12 BUCENS Team | 5 E | 4C | 10 | 50 | -2 | 2 | |||
| 5 SCHOEN Team | 2 TRELOAR Team | 4 S | 4D | 11 | 150 | 3 | -3 | |||
| 10 KASZUBSKI Team | 8 HALFORD Team | 4 W | 5S | 10 | 420 | -9 | 9 | |||
| 2 TRELOAR Team | 5 SCHOEN Team | 5 E | AS | 10 | 50 | -3 | 3 | |||
| 6 BACK Team | 3 AFFLICK Team | 4 E | AS | 9 | 50 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 11 LEHMANN Team | 9 ROLAND Team | 4 W | QC | 9 | 50 | 3 | -3 | |||
| 12 BUCENS Team | 7 THOMAS Team | 5 W | QC | 9 | 100 | 2 | -2 | |||
| 3 AFFLICK Team | 6 BACK Team | 4 W | QD | 9 | 50 | 0 | 0 | |||
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 24 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 4 by NS | +1 | 150 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | +2 | 150 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | +1 | 130 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | -2 | 100 | 1 |
| 5 by EW | -1 | 50 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
| 4 by EW | -1 | 50 | 1 |
| 5 by NS | -1 | -50 | 2 |
| 4 by EW | = | -420 | 1 |