NOOSA SPRING TEAMS - MATCH 3
Board No: 25
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -380
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
20 PROCTOR Team 14 HARINGTON Team 4 E 2H 9 100 6 -6 12 RYAN Team 15 ROBINSON Team 2 E 3D 9 140 11 -11 14 HARINGTON Team 20 PROCTOR Team 3 E 4C 9 140 -6 6 11 STONEMAN Team 18 LOVEDAY Team 4 E 4D 10 620 0 0 16 TUCKEY Team 19 POWLEY Team 3NT W 4S 10 630 0 0 1 RIDLEY Team 4 PERRY Team 4 E 5S 9 100 12 -12 6 MCDONALD Team 7 MIDGLEY Team 4 E 6H 10 620 -12 12 4 PERRY Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 E 6H 10 620 -12 12 5 ROGERS Team 10 TALL Team 4 E 7D 10 620 -12 12 7 MIDGLEY Team 6 MCDONALD Team 4 E 7D 9 100 12 -12 15 ROBINSON Team 12 RYAN Team 4 E 7D 11 650 -11 11 10 TALL Team 5 ROGERS Team 4 E 8D 9 100 12 -12 13 MADSEN Team 9 ROUGHEY Team 4 E 8D 10 620 -12 12 19 POWLEY Team 16 TUCKEY Team 4 E 8D 10 620 0 0 3 VACHON Team 8 MORRISON Team 3NT W 9D 9 600 1 -1 2 KING Team 17 PAULL Team 3NT W 9D 10 630 -12 12 8 MORRISON Team 3 VACHON Team 4 E AC 10 620 -1 1 9 ROUGHEY Team 13 MADSEN Team 4 E AC 9 100 12 -12 17 PAULL Team 2 KING Team 4 E AC 9 100 12 -12 18 LOVEDAY Team 11 STONEMAN Team 4 E AC 10 620 0 0
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 25 | |||
Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
4 by EW | -1 | 100 | 6 |
3 by EW | = | -140 | 1 |
2 by EW | +1 | -140 | 1 |
3NT by EW | = | -600 | 1 |
4 by EW | = | -620 | 8 |
3NT by EW | +1 | -630 | 2 |
4 by EW | +1 | -650 | 1 |