Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA TEAMS - MATCH 8

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 70

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

18 STEENBEEK Team 15 WIPPELL Team 1NT E 7 90 -5 5

10 PRITCHARD Team 3 WENHAM Team 1NT E 7 90 -6 6

20 HARMS Team 6 HENDERSON Team 2 W 8 110 1 -1

13 WILSON Team 19 STRINGER Team 2 N 8 110 0 0

2 EASTMENT Team 12 MUNDELL Team 2 S 8 110 0 0

22 BOYCE Team 14 FRANCIS Team 2 S 8 110 0 0

19 STRINGER Team 13 WILSON Team 2 S 8 110 0 0

17 LEICHT Team 21 REYNOLDS Team 2 S 9 140 0 0

15 WIPPELL Team 18 STEENBEEK Team 2 S 8 110 5 -5

14 FRANCIS Team 22 BOYCE Team 2 S 8 110 0 0

11 SUTTON Team 5 SNOOK Team 2 S 8 110 -3 3

9 MIRTSCHIN Team 1 PARKER Team 2 S 9 140 1 -1

7 MOORE Team 8 SADDLER Team 2 S 7 100 -5 5

4 JESSER Team 16 DALRYMPLE Team 2 S 9 140 7 -7

8 SADDLER Team 7 MOORE Team 3 W 8 100 5 -5

16 DALRYMPLE Team 4 JESSER Team 3 W 9 140 -7 7

6 HENDERSON Team 20 HARMS Team 3 W 9 140 -1 1

3 WENHAM Team 10 PRITCHARD Team 3 S 9 140 6 -6

21 REYNOLDS Team 17 LEICHT Team 3 S 9 140 0 0

12 MUNDELL Team 2 EASTMENT Team 4 W 9 100 0 0

5 SNOOK Team 11 SUTTON Team 4 W 8 200 3 -3

1 PARKER Team 9 MIRTSCHIN Team 4 W 9 100 -1 1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -2 200 1
3 by NS = 140 2
2 by NS +1 140 3
2 by NS = 110 6
2 by NS = 110 1
4 by EW -1 100 2
3 by EW -1 100 1
1NT by EW = -90 2
2 by NS -1 -100 1
2 by EW = -110 1
3 by EW = -140 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
18 STEENBEEK Team	15 WIPPELL Team	1NT E		7		90	-5	5
10 PRITCHARD Team	3 WENHAM Team	1NT E		7		90	-6	6
20 HARMS Team	6 HENDERSON Team	2 W		8		110	1	-1
13 WILSON Team	19 STRINGER Team	2 N		8	110		0	0
2 EASTMENT Team	12 MUNDELL Team	2 S		8	110		0	0
22 BOYCE Team	14 FRANCIS Team	2 S		8	110		0	0
19 STRINGER Team	13 WILSON Team	2 S		8	110		0	0
17 LEICHT Team	21 REYNOLDS Team	2 S		9	140		0	0
15 WIPPELL Team	18 STEENBEEK Team	2 S		8	110		5	-5
14 FRANCIS Team	22 BOYCE Team	2 S		8	110		0	0
11 SUTTON Team	5 SNOOK Team	2 S		8	110		-3	3
9 MIRTSCHIN Team	1 PARKER Team	2 S		9	140		1	-1
7 MOORE Team	8 SADDLER Team	2 S		7		100	-5	5
4 JESSER Team	16 DALRYMPLE Team	2 S		9	140		7	-7
8 SADDLER Team	7 MOORE Team	3 W		8	100		5	-5
16 DALRYMPLE Team	4 JESSER Team	3 W		9		140	-7	7
6 HENDERSON Team	20 HARMS Team	3 W		9		140	-1	1
3 WENHAM Team	10 PRITCHARD Team	3 S		9	140		6	-6
21 REYNOLDS Team	17 LEICHT Team	3 S		9	140		0	0
12 MUNDELL Team	2 EASTMENT Team	4 W		9	100		0	0
5 SNOOK Team	11 SUTTON Team	4 W		8	200		3	-3
1 PARKER Team	9 MIRTSCHIN Team	4 W		9	100		-1	1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-2	200	1
3 by NS	=	140	2
2 by NS	+1	140	3
2 by NS	=	110	6
2 by NS	=	110	1
4 by EW	-1	100	2
3 by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	2
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1
3 by EW	=	-140	2