Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA SWISS TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -400

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

2 FRANCIS Team 1 ROBSON Team 4 W KC 12 680 -11 11

17 ELICH Team 9 BUCKLEY Team 4 W QC 12 680 -9 9

16 EVANS Team 11 CHURCHETT Team 4 E AS 12 680 -13 13

5 MORRISON Team 3 EASTMENT Team 4 E AS 12 680 -13 13

15 REYNOLDS Team 13 JENKIN Team 4 E AS 12 680 -1 1

8 BUCENS Team 6 THOMAS Team 4 W 5C 12 680 -14 14

13 JENKIN Team 15 REYNOLDS Team 4 E AC 11 650 1 -1

12 FULTON Team 7 MCROBERTS Team 4 E AS 11 650 -1 1

7 MCROBERTS Team 12 FULTON Team 4 E AS 10 620 1 -1

14 WIPPELL Team 18 BUCKHAM Team 5X S KS 9 500 -7 7

9 BUCKLEY Team 17 ELICH Team 4 S 6D 7 300 9 -9

18 BUCKHAM Team 14 WIPPELL Team 3 E AS 12 230 7 -7

4 WILLEY Team 10 HARINGTON Team 3 E AC 11 200 -12 12

1 ROBSON Team 2 FRANCIS Team 1NT E 3C 7 90 11 -11

3 EASTMENT Team 5 MORRISON Team 2 W QC 7 100 13 -13

11 CHURCHETT Team 16 EVANS Team 4 E KC 8 200 13 -13

6 THOMAS Team 8 BUCENS Team 5 E AC 8 300 14 -14

10 HARINGTON Team 4 WILLEY Team 4 W 5H 6 400 12 -12

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -4 400 1
5 by EW -3 300 1
4 by EW -2 200 1
2 by EW -1 100 1
1NT by EW = -90 1
3 by EW +2 -200 1
3 by EW +3 -230 1
4 by NS -3 -300 1
5X by NS -2 -500 1
4 by EW = -620 1
4 by EW +1 -650 2
4 by EW +2 -680 3
4 by EW +2 -680 3

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
2 FRANCIS Team	1 ROBSON Team	4 W	KC	12		680	-11	11
17 ELICH Team	9 BUCKLEY Team	4 W	QC	12		680	-9	9
16 EVANS Team	11 CHURCHETT Team	4 E	AS	12		680	-13	13
5 MORRISON Team	3 EASTMENT Team	4 E	AS	12		680	-13	13
15 REYNOLDS Team	13 JENKIN Team	4 E	AS	12		680	-1	1
8 BUCENS Team	6 THOMAS Team	4 W	5C	12		680	-14	14
13 JENKIN Team	15 REYNOLDS Team	4 E	AC	11		650	1	-1
12 FULTON Team	7 MCROBERTS Team	4 E	AS	11		650	-1	1
7 MCROBERTS Team	12 FULTON Team	4 E	AS	10		620	1	-1
14 WIPPELL Team	18 BUCKHAM Team	5X S	KS	9		500	-7	7
9 BUCKLEY Team	17 ELICH Team	4 S	6D	7		300	9	-9
18 BUCKHAM Team	14 WIPPELL Team	3 E	AS	12		230	7	-7
4 WILLEY Team	10 HARINGTON Team	3 E	AC	11		200	-12	12
1 ROBSON Team	2 FRANCIS Team	1NT E	3C	7		90	11	-11
3 EASTMENT Team	5 MORRISON Team	2 W	QC	7	100		13	-13
11 CHURCHETT Team	16 EVANS Team	4 E	KC	8	200		13	-13
6 THOMAS Team	8 BUCENS Team	5 E	AC	8	300		14	-14
10 HARINGTON Team	4 WILLEY Team	4 W	5H	6	400		12	-12

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-4	400	1
5 by EW	-3	300	1
4 by EW	-2	200	1
2 by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
3 by EW	+2	-200	1
3 by EW	+3	-230	1
4 by NS	-3	-300	1
5X by NS	-2	-500	1
4 by EW	=	-620	1
4 by EW	+1	-650	2
4 by EW	+2	-680	3
4 by EW	+2	-680	3