Boards Results

HERVEY BAY SWISS TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -660

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

20 Gauld Team 21 Tipler Team 4 E TH 13 710 -1 1

11 Bucens Team 8 Kellerman Team 4 E 7H 13 710 -2 2

12 Goerg Team 13 George Team 4 E 7H 12 680 0 0

22 Lingard Team 5 Tall Team 4 E 4C 12 680 -2 2

21 Tipler Team 20 Gauld Team 4 E 4C 12 680 1 -1

13 George Team 12 Goerg Team 4 E 4C 12 680 0 0

10 Bundesen Team 14 Cooper Team 4 E TD 12 680 -1 1

9 Gordon Team 1 Busch Team 4 E 2H 12 680 -1 1

7 Beckett Team 4 McGhee Team 4 E 2H 12 680 -1 1

3 Allan Team 6 Trollope Team 4 E TD 12 680 -1 1

8 Kellerman Team 11 Bucens Team 5 E TD 11 650 2 -2

6 Trollope Team 3 Allan Team 4 E 4C 11 650 1 -1

1 Busch Team 9 Gordon Team 4 E 3C 11 650 1 -1

14 Cooper Team 10 Bundesen Team 4 E TD 11 650 1 -1

15 McLean Team 16 Mayes Team 4 E 3C 11 650 0 0

16 Mayes Team 15 McLean Team 4 E TD 11 650 0 0

17 Ruttiman Team 19 Stuart Team 5 E 3C 11 650 0 0

18 Love Team 2 Harris Team 4 E 5C 11 650 0 0

19 Stuart Team 17 Ruttiman Team 4 E 3C 11 650 0 0

4 McGhee Team 7 Beckett Team 4 W 3C 11 650 1 -1

2 Harris Team 18 Love Team 4 E TD 11 650 0 0

5 Tall Team 22 Lingard Team 4 E 3C 10 620 2 -2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW = -620 1
5 by EW = -650 2
4 by EW +1 -650 8
4 by EW +1 -650 1
4 by EW +2 -680 8
4 by EW +3 -710 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
20 Gauld Team	21 Tipler Team	4 E	TH	13		710	-1	1
11 Bucens Team	8 Kellerman Team	4 E	7H	13		710	-2	2
12 Goerg Team	13 George Team	4 E	7H	12		680	0	0
22 Lingard Team	5 Tall Team	4 E	4C	12		680	-2	2
21 Tipler Team	20 Gauld Team	4 E	4C	12		680	1	-1
13 George Team	12 Goerg Team	4 E	4C	12		680	0	0
10 Bundesen Team	14 Cooper Team	4 E	TD	12		680	-1	1
9 Gordon Team	1 Busch Team	4 E	2H	12		680	-1	1
7 Beckett Team	4 McGhee Team	4 E	2H	12		680	-1	1
3 Allan Team	6 Trollope Team	4 E	TD	12		680	-1	1
8 Kellerman Team	11 Bucens Team	5 E	TD	11		650	2	-2
6 Trollope Team	3 Allan Team	4 E	4C	11		650	1	-1
1 Busch Team	9 Gordon Team	4 E	3C	11		650	1	-1
14 Cooper Team	10 Bundesen Team	4 E	TD	11		650	1	-1
15 McLean Team	16 Mayes Team	4 E	3C	11		650	0	0
16 Mayes Team	15 McLean Team	4 E	TD	11		650	0	0
17 Ruttiman Team	19 Stuart Team	5 E	3C	11		650	0	0
18 Love Team	2 Harris Team	4 E	5C	11		650	0	0
19 Stuart Team	17 Ruttiman Team	4 E	3C	11		650	0	0
4 McGhee Team	7 Beckett Team	4 W	3C	11		650	1	-1
2 Harris Team	18 Love Team	4 E	TD	11		650	0	0
5 Tall Team	22 Lingard Team	4 E	3C	10		620	2	-2

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	=	-620	1
5 by EW	=	-650	2
4 by EW	+1	-650	8
4 by EW	+1	-650	1
4 by EW	+2	-680	8
4 by EW	+3	-710	2