Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA NOVICE TEAMS 2015 - MATCH 4

Board No: 27
Dealer: S, Vul: Nil, Room Datum: 330

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

3 BENNETT Team 1 KNIGHT Team 3NT N AD 9 400 -1 1

20 WITENDEN Team 2 GLASBY Team 3NT N 9C 8 50 -10 10

1 KNIGHT Team 3 BENNETT Team 4 N 4C 10 420 1 -1

5 VINES Team 4 STRINGER Team 3NT N 3D 11 460 1 -1

4 STRINGER Team 5 VINES Team 4 N AD 10 420 -1 1

8 LITTLE Team 6 EVANS Team 3NT S 4D 8 50 -11 11

18 BENDALL Team 7 BLENCOE Team 4 N 4C 11 450 1 -1

6 EVANS Team 8 LITTLE Team 4 N AD 11 450 11 -11

14 ROBERTS Team 9 KLIBBE Team 3NT N AD 7 100 -7 7

19 BARNETT Team 10 PARRY Team 4 N AD 11 450 1 -1

15 LINDAU Team 11 HOSFIELD Team 3 S 8C 10 170 -6 6

16 ORRIN Team 12 SPENCE Team 4 N 9C 11 450 7 -7

17 WHITE Team 13 CLARK Team 2 S 7H 11 200 -6 6

9 KLIBBE Team 14 ROBERTS Team 3 S 8C 10 170 7 -7

11 HOSFIELD Team 15 LINDAU Team 3NT N 3D 9 400 6 -6

12 SPENCE Team 16 ORRIN Team 3 S 8C 10 170 -7 7

13 CLARK Team 17 WHITE Team 4 N 6C 10 420 6 -6

7 BLENCOE Team 18 BENDALL Team 3NT N 4C 10 430 -1 1

10 PARRY Team 19 BARNETT Team 4 N 3D 10 420 -1 1

2 GLASBY Team 20 WITENDEN Team 4 N 8S 10 420 10 -10

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 27
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by NS +2 460 1
4 by NS +1 450 4
3NT by NS +1 430 1
4 by NS = 420 5
3NT by NS = 400 2
2 by NS +3 200 1
3 by NS +1 170 3
3NT by NS -1 -50 1
3NT by NS -1 -50 1
3NT by NS -2 -100 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
3 BENNETT Team	1 KNIGHT Team	3NT N	AD	9	400		-1	1
20 WITENDEN Team	2 GLASBY Team	3NT N	9C	8		50	-10	10
1 KNIGHT Team	3 BENNETT Team	4 N	4C	10	420		1	-1
5 VINES Team	4 STRINGER Team	3NT N	3D	11	460		1	-1
4 STRINGER Team	5 VINES Team	4 N	AD	10	420		-1	1
8 LITTLE Team	6 EVANS Team	3NT S	4D	8		50	-11	11
18 BENDALL Team	7 BLENCOE Team	4 N	4C	11	450		1	-1
6 EVANS Team	8 LITTLE Team	4 N	AD	11	450		11	-11
14 ROBERTS Team	9 KLIBBE Team	3NT N	AD	7		100	-7	7
19 BARNETT Team	10 PARRY Team	4 N	AD	11	450		1	-1
15 LINDAU Team	11 HOSFIELD Team	3 S	8C	10	170		-6	6
16 ORRIN Team	12 SPENCE Team	4 N	9C	11	450		7	-7
17 WHITE Team	13 CLARK Team	2 S	7H	11	200		-6	6
9 KLIBBE Team	14 ROBERTS Team	3 S	8C	10	170		7	-7
11 HOSFIELD Team	15 LINDAU Team	3NT N	3D	9	400		6	-6
12 SPENCE Team	16 ORRIN Team	3 S	8C	10	170		-7	7
13 CLARK Team	17 WHITE Team	4 N	6C	10	420		6	-6
7 BLENCOE Team	18 BENDALL Team	3NT N	4C	10	430		-1	1
10 PARRY Team	19 BARNETT Team	4 N	3D	10	420		-1	1
2 GLASBY Team	20 WITENDEN Team	4 N	8S	10	420		10	-10

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 27
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	+2	460	1
4 by NS	+1	450	4
3NT by NS	+1	430	1
4 by NS	=	420	5
3NT by NS	=	400	2
2 by NS	+3	200	1
3 by NS	+1	170	3
3NT by NS	-1	-50	1
3NT by NS	-1	-50	1
3NT by NS	-2	-100	1