Boards Results

SCZ GNOT SEMI-FINAL - MATCH 7

Board No: 28
Dealer: W, Vul: NS, Room Datum: 80
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

17 FRENCH Team 19 SMITH Team 2 E 9 140 -8 8

32 CRESTANELLI Team 27 MUSGRAVE Team 3 N 7 200 -7 7

31 LYONS Team 4 TROLLOPE Team 3 E 6 150 0 0

30 KENDALL Team 7 HICKS Team 2 E 8 110 -6 6

29 CLEMINSON Team 10 TALL Team 3 E 8 50 -3 3

28 BREENE Team 15 TANNAHILL Team 3NT S 6 300 -9 9

27 MUSGRAVE Team 32 CRESTANELLI Team 3 E 7 100 7 -7

26 TUCKEY Team 8 TOWNEND Team 4 E 5 250 3 -3

25 MOODY Team 18 WALKER Team 1NT S 7 90 5 -5

24 LONGDEN Team 20 PAULL Team 2NT S 8 120 0 0

23 HAMM Team 22 BEALE Team 3 E 7 100 6 -6

22 BEALE Team 23 HAMM Team 3 E 9 140 -6 6

21 MAY Team 13 EARLY Team 3 E 7 100 -2 2

20 PAULL Team 24 LONGDEN Team 3 N 9 110 0 0

19 SMITH Team 17 FRENCH Team 2NT E 4 200 8 -8

18 WALKER Team 25 MOODY Team 2 E 8 110 -5 5

1 CROWLEY Team 16 MCARTHUR Team 3 E 6 150 2 -2

16 MCARTHUR Team 1 CROWLEY Team 2 E 6 100 -2 2

15 TANNAHILL Team 28 BREENE Team 3 N 9 110 9 -9

14 NIMMO Team 12 WATSON Team 4 E 8 100 0 0

13 EARLY Team 21 MAY Team 1NT N 9 150 2 -2

12 WATSON Team 14 NIMMO Team 2 W 6 100 0 0

11 STRINGFELLOW Team 3 BEIL Team 4 E 7 150 2 -2

10 TALL Team 29 CLEMINSON Team 3 E 6 150 3 -3

9 BYRNES Team 5 MACKINLAY Team 3 N 8 100 -6 6

8 TOWNEND Team 26 TUCKEY Team 4 N 10 130 -3 3

7 HICKS Team 30 KENDALL Team 2 E 5 150 6 -6

6 MORRISON Team 2 DAWSON Team 3 E 7 100 -2 2

5 MACKINLAY Team 9 BYRNES Team 4 E 7 150 6 -6

4 TROLLOPE Team 31 LYONS Team 1NT N 9 150 0 0

3 BEIL Team 11 STRINGFELLOW Team 2 N 8 90 -2 2

2 DAWSON Team 6 MORRISON Team 3NT E 6 150 2 -2

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Jump to
Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by EW -5 250 1
2NT by EW -4 200 1
3NT by EW -3 150 1
4 by EW -3 150 2
2 by EW -3 150 1
3 by EW -3 150 3
1NT by NS +2 150 2
4 by NS = 130 1
2NT by NS = 120 1
3 by NS = 110 2
4 by EW -2 100 1
2 by EW -2 100 1
2 by EW -2 100 1
3 by EW -2 100 4
1NT by NS = 90 1
2 by NS = 90 1
3 by EW -1 50 1
3 by NS -1 -100 1
2 by EW = -110 2
3 by EW = -140 1
2 by EW +1 -140 1
3 by NS -2 -200 1
3NT by NS -3 -300 1

Return to this event's results

Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
17 FRENCH Team	19 SMITH Team	2 E		9		140	-8	8
32 CRESTANELLI Team	27 MUSGRAVE Team	3 N		7		200	-7	7
31 LYONS Team	4 TROLLOPE Team	3 E		6	150		0	0
30 KENDALL Team	7 HICKS Team	2 E		8		110	-6	6
29 CLEMINSON Team	10 TALL Team	3 E		8	50		-3	3
28 BREENE Team	15 TANNAHILL Team	3NT S		6		300	-9	9
27 MUSGRAVE Team	32 CRESTANELLI Team	3 E		7	100		7	-7
26 TUCKEY Team	8 TOWNEND Team	4 E		5	250		3	-3
25 MOODY Team	18 WALKER Team	1NT S		7	90		5	-5
24 LONGDEN Team	20 PAULL Team	2NT S		8	120		0	0
23 HAMM Team	22 BEALE Team	3 E		7	100		6	-6
22 BEALE Team	23 HAMM Team	3 E		9		140	-6	6
21 MAY Team	13 EARLY Team	3 E		7	100		-2	2
20 PAULL Team	24 LONGDEN Team	3 N		9	110		0	0
19 SMITH Team	17 FRENCH Team	2NT E		4	200		8	-8
18 WALKER Team	25 MOODY Team	2 E		8		110	-5	5
1 CROWLEY Team	16 MCARTHUR Team	3 E		6	150		2	-2
16 MCARTHUR Team	1 CROWLEY Team	2 E		6	100		-2	2
15 TANNAHILL Team	28 BREENE Team	3 N		9	110		9	-9
14 NIMMO Team	12 WATSON Team	4 E		8	100		0	0
13 EARLY Team	21 MAY Team	1NT N		9	150		2	-2
12 WATSON Team	14 NIMMO Team	2 W		6	100		0	0
11 STRINGFELLOW Team	3 BEIL Team	4 E		7	150		2	-2
10 TALL Team	29 CLEMINSON Team	3 E		6	150		3	-3
9 BYRNES Team	5 MACKINLAY Team	3 N		8		100	-6	6
8 TOWNEND Team	26 TUCKEY Team	4 N		10	130		-3	3
7 HICKS Team	30 KENDALL Team	2 E		5	150		6	-6
6 MORRISON Team	2 DAWSON Team	3 E		7	100		-2	2
5 MACKINLAY Team	9 BYRNES Team	4 E		7	150		6	-6
4 TROLLOPE Team	31 LYONS Team	1NT N		9	150		0	0
3 BEIL Team	11 STRINGFELLOW Team	2 N		8	90		-2	2
2 DAWSON Team	6 MORRISON Team	3NT E		6	150		2	-2

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by EW	-5	250	1
2NT by EW	-4	200	1
3NT by EW	-3	150	1
4 by EW	-3	150	2
2 by EW	-3	150	1
3 by EW	-3	150	3
1NT by NS	+2	150	2
4 by NS	=	130	1
2NT by NS	=	120	1
3 by NS	=	110	2
4 by EW	-2	100	1
2 by EW	-2	100	1
2 by EW	-2	100	1
3 by EW	-2	100	4
1NT by NS	=	90	1
2 by NS	=	90	1
3 by EW	-1	50	1
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by EW	=	-110	2
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
3NT by NS	-3	-300	1