Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA NOVICE TEAMS 2015 - MATCH 4

Board No: 28
Dealer: W, Vul: NS, Room Datum: 20

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

10 PARRY Team 19 BARNETT Team 2 E 2S 8 110 1 -1

4 STRINGER Team 5 VINES Team 3 E 3D 9 140 -1 1

18 BENDALL Team 7 BLENCOE Team 2 E 3D 11 200 -6 6

15 LINDAU Team 11 HOSFIELD Team 2 E 3D 8 110 -5 5

16 ORRIN Team 12 SPENCE Team 3 E 3D 7 100 0 0

3 BENNETT Team 1 KNIGHT Team 3 N 3H 10 130 -1 1

9 KLIBBE Team 14 ROBERTS Team 1NT N 3H 7 90 1 -1

12 SPENCE Team 16 ORRIN Team 3 S 4H 9 110 0 0

13 CLARK Team 17 WHITE Team 3 E 6C 10 170 -7 7

11 HOSFIELD Team 15 LINDAU Team 1 N 9C 8 90 5 -5

19 BARNETT Team 10 PARRY Team 2 W AC 9 140 -1 1

14 ROBERTS Team 9 KLIBBE Team 3 E AC 8 50 -1 1

7 BLENCOE Team 18 BENDALL Team 3 W AS 8 50 6 -6

17 WHITE Team 13 CLARK Team 2 S JH 9 140 7 -7

5 VINES Team 4 STRINGER Team 2 E KD 8 110 1 -1

20 WITENDEN Team 2 GLASBY Team 3 E QC 7 100 0 0

6 EVANS Team 8 LITTLE Team 3 E QC 8 50 0 0

2 GLASBY Team 20 WITENDEN Team 3 E QC 7 100 0 0

1 KNIGHT Team 3 BENNETT Team 3 E QS 6 150 1 -1

8 LITTLE Team 6 EVANS Team 3 E TS 8 50 0 0

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract Result Score Frequency
3 by EW -3 150 1
2 by NS +1 140 1
3 by NS +1 130 1
3 by NS = 110 1
3 by EW -2 100 3
1NT by NS = 90 1
1 by NS +1 90 1
3 by EW -1 50 3
3 by EW -1 50 1
2 by EW = -110 3
3 by EW = -140 1
2 by EW +1 -140 1
3 by EW +1 -170 1
2 by EW +3 -200 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
10 PARRY Team	19 BARNETT Team	2 E	2S	8		110	1	-1
4 STRINGER Team	5 VINES Team	3 E	3D	9		140	-1	1
18 BENDALL Team	7 BLENCOE Team	2 E	3D	11		200	-6	6
15 LINDAU Team	11 HOSFIELD Team	2 E	3D	8		110	-5	5
16 ORRIN Team	12 SPENCE Team	3 E	3D	7	100		0	0
3 BENNETT Team	1 KNIGHT Team	3 N	3H	10	130		-1	1
9 KLIBBE Team	14 ROBERTS Team	1NT N	3H	7	90		1	-1
12 SPENCE Team	16 ORRIN Team	3 S	4H	9	110		0	0
13 CLARK Team	17 WHITE Team	3 E	6C	10		170	-7	7
11 HOSFIELD Team	15 LINDAU Team	1 N	9C	8	90		5	-5
19 BARNETT Team	10 PARRY Team	2 W	AC	9		140	-1	1
14 ROBERTS Team	9 KLIBBE Team	3 E	AC	8	50		-1	1
7 BLENCOE Team	18 BENDALL Team	3 W	AS	8	50		6	-6
17 WHITE Team	13 CLARK Team	2 S	JH	9	140		7	-7
5 VINES Team	4 STRINGER Team	2 E	KD	8		110	1	-1
20 WITENDEN Team	2 GLASBY Team	3 E	QC	7	100		0	0
6 EVANS Team	8 LITTLE Team	3 E	QC	8	50		0	0
2 GLASBY Team	20 WITENDEN Team	3 E	QC	7	100		0	0
1 KNIGHT Team	3 BENNETT Team	3 E	QS	6	150		1	-1
8 LITTLE Team	6 EVANS Team	3 E	TS	8	50		0	0

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3 by EW	-3	150	1
2 by NS	+1	140	1
3 by NS	+1	130	1
3 by NS	=	110	1
3 by EW	-2	100	3
1NT by NS	=	90	1
1 by NS	+1	90	1
3 by EW	-1	50	3
3 by EW	-1	50	1
2 by EW	=	-110	3
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
3 by EW	+1	-170	1
2 by EW	+3	-200	1