Boards Results

BRC RESTRICTED TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 28
Dealer: W, Vul: NS, Room Datum: 250

Go to Previous Board          Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

16 EDGINTON Team 6 VAN KRUISTUM Team 4 N 2H 11 650 1 -1

22 BELL Team 18 COLBERT Team 4 N 5D 9 100 -6 6

20 SANDERS Team 12 LOVE Team 4 N 5D 9 100 -12 12

8 SHUTTLEWOOD Team 10 CARE Team 4 N 5D 10 620 12 -12

17 TING Team 4 KAROL Team 4 N 5D 10 620 10 -10

11 GARSIDE Team 15 GEORGEES Team 4 N 5D 9 100 5 -5

13 BURRIE Team 9 ROHRIG Team 4 N 5D 9 100 0 0

14 SHU YANG Team 3 GIBSON Team 4 N 5D 10 620 0 0

3 GIBSON Team 14 SHU YANG Team 4 N 5H 10 620 0 0

9 ROHRIG Team 13 BURRIE Team 4 N 5H 9 100 0 0

19 CLARKE Team 21 MCMAHON Team 4 N AS 11 650 1 -1

12 LOVE Team 20 SANDERS Team 4 N QD 10 620 12 -12

21 MCMAHON Team 19 CLARKE Team 4 N QD 10 620 -1 1

18 COLBERT Team 22 BELL Team 2 N QD 9 140 6 -6

1 PAGE Team 5 GIBBARDS Team 4 N QD 9 100 -12 12

10 CARE Team 8 SHUTTLEWOOD Team 4 N QD 9 100 -12 12

7 SAXBY Team 2 RAMSUND Team 4 N QD 9 100 0 0

6 VAN KRUISTUM Team 16 EDGINTON Team 4 N QD 10 620 -1 1

5 GIBBARDS Team 1 PAGE Team 4 N QD 10 620 12 -12

4 KAROL Team 17 TING Team 3 N QD 9 140 -10 10

2 RAMSUND Team 7 SAXBY Team 4 N QD 9 100 0 0

15 GEORGEES Team 11 GARSIDE Team 4 S TD 7 300 -5 5

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board          Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by NS +1 650 2
4 by NS = 620 8
3 by NS = 140 1
2 by NS +1 140 1
4 by NS -1 -100 9
4 by NS -3 -300 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
16 EDGINTON Team	6 VAN KRUISTUM Team	4 N	2H	11	650		1	-1
22 BELL Team	18 COLBERT Team	4 N	5D	9		100	-6	6
20 SANDERS Team	12 LOVE Team	4 N	5D	9		100	-12	12
8 SHUTTLEWOOD Team	10 CARE Team	4 N	5D	10	620		12	-12
17 TING Team	4 KAROL Team	4 N	5D	10	620		10	-10
11 GARSIDE Team	15 GEORGEES Team	4 N	5D	9		100	5	-5
13 BURRIE Team	9 ROHRIG Team	4 N	5D	9		100	0	0
14 SHU YANG Team	3 GIBSON Team	4 N	5D	10	620		0	0
3 GIBSON Team	14 SHU YANG Team	4 N	5H	10	620		0	0
9 ROHRIG Team	13 BURRIE Team	4 N	5H	9		100	0	0
19 CLARKE Team	21 MCMAHON Team	4 N	AS	11	650		1	-1
12 LOVE Team	20 SANDERS Team	4 N	QD	10	620		12	-12
21 MCMAHON Team	19 CLARKE Team	4 N	QD	10	620		-1	1
18 COLBERT Team	22 BELL Team	2 N	QD	9	140		6	-6
1 PAGE Team	5 GIBBARDS Team	4 N	QD	9		100	-12	12
10 CARE Team	8 SHUTTLEWOOD Team	4 N	QD	9		100	-12	12
7 SAXBY Team	2 RAMSUND Team	4 N	QD	9		100	0	0
6 VAN KRUISTUM Team	16 EDGINTON Team	4 N	QD	10	620		-1	1
5 GIBBARDS Team	1 PAGE Team	4 N	QD	10	620		12	-12
4 KAROL Team	17 TING Team	3 N	QD	9	140		-10	10
2 RAMSUND Team	7 SAXBY Team	4 N	QD	9		100	0	0
15 GEORGEES Team	11 GARSIDE Team	4 S	TD	7		300	-5	5

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 28
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by NS	+1	650	2
4 by NS	=	620	8
3 by NS	=	140	1
2 by NS	+1	140	1
4 by NS	-1	-100	9
4 by NS	-3	-300	1