Boards Results

BUNDABERG TEAMS - MATCH 4

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 130

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 LORRAWAY Team 8 FISHER Team 2 N 9 140 0 0

2 ALLAN Team 3 HARRIS Team 2 N 9 140 0 0

3 HARRIS Team 2 ALLAN Team 3 N 9 140 0 0

4 STONEMAN Team 16 GALLETLEY Team 3 N 9 140 0 0

5 METCALF Team 17 AKHTAR Team 3 N 9 140 0 0

6 BUNDENSEN Team 9 MAYES Team 2 N 8 110 -3 3

7 GORDON Team 13 PALASTHY Team 2 N 9 140 1 -1

8 FISHER Team 1 LORRAWAY Team 2 N 9 140 0 0

9 MAYES Team 6 BUNDENSEN Team 5 W 9 200 3 -3

10 LOHMANN Team 19 BLOORE Team 2 N 9 140 1 -1

11 TUCKEY Team 14 COTTER Team 2 N 10 170 1 -1

12 HICKMAN Team 20 BOWMAN Team 4 N 8 200 -3 3

13 PALASTHY Team 7 GORDON Team 2 N 8 110 -1 1

14 COTTER Team 11 TUCKEY Team 2 N 9 140 -1 1

15 MASON Team 22 VAN HAREN Team 2 N 11 200 3 -3

16 GALLETLEY Team 4 STONEMAN Team 2 N 9 140 0 0

17 AKHTAR Team 5 METCALF Team 2 N 9 140 0 0

18 LOVE Team 21 BLACK Team 2 N 8 110 0 0

19 BLOORE Team 10 LOHMANN Team 2 N 8 110 -1 1

20 BOWMAN Team 12 HICKMAN Team 3 N 8 100 3 -3

21 BLACK Team 18 LOVE Team 2 N 8 110 0 0

22 VAN HAREN Team 15 MASON Team 2 N 8 110 -3 3

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW -2 200 1
2 by NS +3 200 1
2 by NS +2 170 1
3 by NS = 140 3
2 by NS +1 140 8
2 by NS = 110 6
3 by NS -1 -100 1
4 by NS -2 -200 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 LORRAWAY Team	8 FISHER Team	2 N		9	140		0	0
2 ALLAN Team	3 HARRIS Team	2 N		9	140		0	0
3 HARRIS Team	2 ALLAN Team	3 N		9	140		0	0
4 STONEMAN Team	16 GALLETLEY Team	3 N		9	140		0	0
5 METCALF Team	17 AKHTAR Team	3 N		9	140		0	0
6 BUNDENSEN Team	9 MAYES Team	2 N		8	110		-3	3
7 GORDON Team	13 PALASTHY Team	2 N		9	140		1	-1
8 FISHER Team	1 LORRAWAY Team	2 N		9	140		0	0
9 MAYES Team	6 BUNDENSEN Team	5 W		9	200		3	-3
10 LOHMANN Team	19 BLOORE Team	2 N		9	140		1	-1
11 TUCKEY Team	14 COTTER Team	2 N		10	170		1	-1
12 HICKMAN Team	20 BOWMAN Team	4 N		8		200	-3	3
13 PALASTHY Team	7 GORDON Team	2 N		8	110		-1	1
14 COTTER Team	11 TUCKEY Team	2 N		9	140		-1	1
15 MASON Team	22 VAN HAREN Team	2 N		11	200		3	-3
16 GALLETLEY Team	4 STONEMAN Team	2 N		9	140		0	0
17 AKHTAR Team	5 METCALF Team	2 N		9	140		0	0
18 LOVE Team	21 BLACK Team	2 N		8	110		0	0
19 BLOORE Team	10 LOHMANN Team	2 N		8	110		-1	1
20 BOWMAN Team	12 HICKMAN Team	3 N		8		100	3	-3
21 BLACK Team	18 LOVE Team	2 N		8	110		0	0
22 VAN HAREN Team	15 MASON Team	2 N		8	110		-3	3

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	-2	200	1
2 by NS	+3	200	1
2 by NS	+2	170	1
3 by NS	=	140	3
2 by NS	+1	140	8
2 by NS	=	110	6
3 by NS	-1	-100	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	1