Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA NOVICE TEAMS 2015 - MATCH 4

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 90

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

9 KLIBBE Team 14 ROBERTS Team 4 N JH 11 650 13 -13

2 GLASBY Team 20 WITENDEN Team 4 N 6D 11 650 11 -11

4 STRINGER Team 5 VINES Team 4 N 6D 11 650 11 -11

16 ORRIN Team 12 SPENCE Team 5 W AS 8 300 11 -11

3 BENNETT Team 1 KNIGHT Team 5 W AS 10 100 7 -7

11 HOSFIELD Team 15 LINDAU Team 4 W AS 9 100 6 -6

17 WHITE Team 13 CLARK Team 5 W 5H 10 100 6 -6

7 BLENCOE Team 18 BENDALL Team 4 W TC 9 100 6 -6

8 LITTLE Team 6 EVANS Team 4 W AS 9 100 5 -5

10 PARRY Team 19 BARNETT Team 5 W AS 9 200 1 -1

19 BARNETT Team 10 PARRY Team 3 N 2D 10 170 -1 1

6 EVANS Team 8 LITTLE Team 5 N AH 10 100 -5 5

13 CLARK Team 17 WHITE Team 4 W AS 10 130 -6 6

15 LINDAU Team 11 HOSFIELD Team 4 W AS 10 130 -6 6

18 BENDALL Team 7 BLENCOE Team 3 W AS 10 130 -6 6

1 KNIGHT Team 3 BENNETT Team 4 N 4C 8 200 -7 7

12 SPENCE Team 16 ORRIN Team 4 N 4C 8 200 -11 11

5 VINES Team 4 STRINGER Team 4 W AS 9 100 -11 11

20 WITENDEN Team 2 GLASBY Team 4 S AH 10 130 -11 11

14 ROBERTS Team 9 KLIBBE Team 4 W 5H 10 130 -13 13

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by NS +1 650 3
5 by EW -3 300 1
5 by EW -2 200 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
4 by NS = 130 1
5 by EW -1 100 2
4 by EW -1 100 4
5 by NS -1 -100 1
4 by EW = -130 3
3 by EW +1 -130 1
4 by NS -2 -200 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
9 KLIBBE Team	14 ROBERTS Team	4 N	JH	11	650		13	-13
2 GLASBY Team	20 WITENDEN Team	4 N	6D	11	650		11	-11
4 STRINGER Team	5 VINES Team	4 N	6D	11	650		11	-11
16 ORRIN Team	12 SPENCE Team	5 W	AS	8	300		11	-11
3 BENNETT Team	1 KNIGHT Team	5 W	AS	10	100		7	-7
11 HOSFIELD Team	15 LINDAU Team	4 W	AS	9	100		6	-6
17 WHITE Team	13 CLARK Team	5 W	5H	10	100		6	-6
7 BLENCOE Team	18 BENDALL Team	4 W	TC	9	100		6	-6
8 LITTLE Team	6 EVANS Team	4 W	AS	9	100		5	-5
10 PARRY Team	19 BARNETT Team	5 W	AS	9	200		1	-1
19 BARNETT Team	10 PARRY Team	3 N	2D	10	170		-1	1
6 EVANS Team	8 LITTLE Team	5 N	AH	10		100	-5	5
13 CLARK Team	17 WHITE Team	4 W	AS	10		130	-6	6
15 LINDAU Team	11 HOSFIELD Team	4 W	AS	10		130	-6	6
18 BENDALL Team	7 BLENCOE Team	3 W	AS	10		130	-6	6
1 KNIGHT Team	3 BENNETT Team	4 N	4C	8		200	-7	7
12 SPENCE Team	16 ORRIN Team	4 N	4C	8		200	-11	11
5 VINES Team	4 STRINGER Team	4 W	AS	9	100		-11	11
20 WITENDEN Team	2 GLASBY Team	4 S	AH	10	130		-11	11
14 ROBERTS Team	9 KLIBBE Team	4 W	5H	10		130	-13	13

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by NS	+1	650	3
5 by EW	-3	300	1
5 by EW	-2	200	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
5 by EW	-1	100	2
4 by EW	-1	100	4
5 by NS	-1	-100	1
4 by EW	=	-130	3
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	2