Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA NOVICE TEAMS 2015 - MATCH 4

Board No: 29
Dealer: N, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 90

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

3 BENNETT Team 1 KNIGHT Team 5 W AS 10 100 7 -7

20 WITENDEN Team 2 GLASBY Team 4 S AH 10 130 -11 11

1 KNIGHT Team 3 BENNETT Team 4 N 4C 8 200 -7 7

5 VINES Team 4 STRINGER Team 4 W AS 9 100 -11 11

4 STRINGER Team 5 VINES Team 4 N 6D 11 650 11 -11

8 LITTLE Team 6 EVANS Team 4 W AS 9 100 5 -5

18 BENDALL Team 7 BLENCOE Team 3 W AS 10 130 -6 6

6 EVANS Team 8 LITTLE Team 5 N AH 10 100 -5 5

14 ROBERTS Team 9 KLIBBE Team 4 W 5H 10 130 -13 13

19 BARNETT Team 10 PARRY Team 3 N 2D 10 170 -1 1

15 LINDAU Team 11 HOSFIELD Team 4 W AS 10 130 -6 6

16 ORRIN Team 12 SPENCE Team 5 W AS 8 300 11 -11

17 WHITE Team 13 CLARK Team 5 W 5H 10 100 6 -6

9 KLIBBE Team 14 ROBERTS Team 4 N JH 11 650 13 -13

11 HOSFIELD Team 15 LINDAU Team 4 W AS 9 100 6 -6

12 SPENCE Team 16 ORRIN Team 4 N 4C 8 200 -11 11

13 CLARK Team 17 WHITE Team 4 W AS 10 130 -6 6

7 BLENCOE Team 18 BENDALL Team 4 W TC 9 100 6 -6

10 PARRY Team 19 BARNETT Team 5 W AS 9 200 1 -1

2 GLASBY Team 20 WITENDEN Team 4 N 6D 11 650 11 -11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract Result Score Frequency
4 by NS +1 650 3
5 by EW -3 300 1
5 by EW -2 200 1
3 by NS +1 170 1
4 by NS = 130 1
5 by EW -1 100 2
4 by EW -1 100 4
5 by NS -1 -100 1
4 by EW = -130 3
3 by EW +1 -130 1
4 by NS -2 -200 2

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
3 BENNETT Team	1 KNIGHT Team	5 W	AS	10	100		7	-7
20 WITENDEN Team	2 GLASBY Team	4 S	AH	10	130		-11	11
1 KNIGHT Team	3 BENNETT Team	4 N	4C	8		200	-7	7
5 VINES Team	4 STRINGER Team	4 W	AS	9	100		-11	11
4 STRINGER Team	5 VINES Team	4 N	6D	11	650		11	-11
8 LITTLE Team	6 EVANS Team	4 W	AS	9	100		5	-5
18 BENDALL Team	7 BLENCOE Team	3 W	AS	10		130	-6	6
6 EVANS Team	8 LITTLE Team	5 N	AH	10		100	-5	5
14 ROBERTS Team	9 KLIBBE Team	4 W	5H	10		130	-13	13
19 BARNETT Team	10 PARRY Team	3 N	2D	10	170		-1	1
15 LINDAU Team	11 HOSFIELD Team	4 W	AS	10		130	-6	6
16 ORRIN Team	12 SPENCE Team	5 W	AS	8	300		11	-11
17 WHITE Team	13 CLARK Team	5 W	5H	10	100		6	-6
9 KLIBBE Team	14 ROBERTS Team	4 N	JH	11	650		13	-13
11 HOSFIELD Team	15 LINDAU Team	4 W	AS	9	100		6	-6
12 SPENCE Team	16 ORRIN Team	4 N	4C	8		200	-11	11
13 CLARK Team	17 WHITE Team	4 W	AS	10		130	-6	6
7 BLENCOE Team	18 BENDALL Team	4 W	TC	9	100		6	-6
10 PARRY Team	19 BARNETT Team	5 W	AS	9	200		1	-1
2 GLASBY Team	20 WITENDEN Team	4 N	6D	11	650		11	-11

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 29
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4 by NS	+1	650	3
5 by EW	-3	300	1
5 by EW	-2	200	1
3 by NS	+1	170	1
4 by NS	=	130	1
5 by EW	-1	100	2
4 by EW	-1	100	4
5 by NS	-1	-100	1
4 by EW	=	-130	3
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
4 by NS	-2	-200	2