Teams					Score			Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW		NS	EW
23 WHITE Team	30 NEVILLE Team	4 W	2H	8	200			-12	12
8 MOTTRAM Team	25 ROSE Team	2 W	5H	9		140		-14	14
11 WHITTON Team	31 REDLICH Team	3NT W	6H	8	100			-3	3
34 ATKINSON Team	12 PRIESTLEY Team	5 S	AS	8		300		-12	12
27 KANTOR Team	21 PLUMMER Team	4 W	KH	11		650		-16	16
28 LIANG YANG Team	5 KUMAR Team	5X N	QH	8		800		-16	16
22 JEFFERY Team	24 BUSH Team	4 W	TH	7	300			5	-5
20 LACEY Team	6 MATHESON Team	4X W	TH	7	800			12	-12
24 BUSH Team	22 JEFFERY Team	4 W	TH	9	100			-5	5
25 ROSE Team	8 MOTTRAM Team	4X W	TH	7	800			14	-14
26 COOPER Team	29 SNOW Team	3 W	TH	9		140		-12	12
29 SNOW Team	26 COOPER Team	4X W	TH	8	500			12	-12
30 NEVILLE Team	23 WHITE Team	4X W	TH	7	800			12	-12
31 REDLICH Team	11 WHITTON Team	4X W	TH	9	200			3	-3
32 MONTAGNA Team	38 CHAFFEY Team	4 W	TH	10		620		-16	16
33 JACKA Team	2 FINIKIOTIS Team	2 W	TH	9		140		-6	6
35 DURHAM Team	36 HOSCHKE Team	5X W	TH	9	500			7	-7
36 HOSCHKE Team	35 DURHAM Team	4X W	TH	9	200			-7	7
37 YOUNG Team	15 SMITH Team	4 W	TH	9	100			-12	12
38 CHAFFEY Team	32 MONTAGNA Team	4X W	TH	7	800			16	-16
12 PRIESTLEY Team	34 ATKINSON Team	4 W	TH	7	300			12	-12
2 FINIKIOTIS Team	33 JACKA Team	3 W	TH	8	100			6	-6
3 BOCK Team	13 SCOTFORD Team	4X W	TH	7	800			12	-12
4 CARTMELL Team	7 MARSHALL Team	3X W	TH	8	200			-12	12
5 KUMAR Team	28 LIANG YANG Team	4X W	TH	8	500			16	-16
6 MATHESON Team	20 LACEY Team	4 W	TH	8	200			-12	12
7 MARSHALL Team	4 CARTMELL Team	4X W	TH	7	800			12	-12
9 STOBO Team	10 LIMAYE Team	4X W	TH	9	200			-7	7
10 LIMAYE Team	9 STOBO Team	4X W	TH	8	500			7	-7
21 PLUMMER Team	27 KANTOR Team	4X W	TH	7	800			16	-16
13 SCOTFORD Team	3 BOCK Team	4 W	TH	8	200			-12	12
14 WEAVER Team	1 FOLKARD Team	4 W	TH	8	200			3	-3
15 SMITH Team	37 YOUNG Team	4X W	TH	7	800			12	-12
16 BATES Team	19 WHIDDON Team	4X W	TH	7	800			12	-12
17 NICHOLS Team	18 LISLE Team	4 W	TH	10		620		-16	16
18 LISLE Team	17 NICHOLS Team	4X W	TH	7	800			16	-16
19 WHIDDON Team	16 BATES Team	4X W	TH	9	200			-12	12
1 FOLKARD Team	14 WEAVER Team	4 W	TH	9	100			-3	3

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.

If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 4
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
4X by EW	-3	800	10
4X by EW	-2	500	3
5X by EW	-2	500	1
4 by EW	-3	300	2
4 by EW	-2	200	4
3X by EW	-1	200	1
4X by EW	-1	200	4
4 by EW	-1	100	3
3 by EW	-1	100	1
3NT by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	=	-140	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	2
5 by NS	-3	-300	1
4 by EW	=	-620	2
4 by EW	+1	-650	1
5X by NS	-3	-800	1

Alternative display format