Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA NOVICE TEAMS 2012 - MATCH 6

Board No: 9
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -210

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

15 LONG Team 3 HASLAM Team 2 W H5 10 130 0 0

19 SPENCE Team 5 REYNOLDS Team 2 E SQ 11 150 -6 6

17 CHEESMAN Team 11 SWINSON Team 2 W C6 10 130 -8 8

16 ELICH Team 4 CLARK Team 3 E H7 9 110 11 -11

14 DALRYMPLE Team 10 LEY Team 3 E C4 11 150 10 -10

1 POWELL Team 18 POWER Team 3 E SA 10 130 10 -10

3 HASLAM Team 15 LONG Team 3 W H6 10 130 0 0

18 POWER Team 1 POWELL Team 3NT E C4 9 600 -10 10

10 LEY Team 14 DALRYMPLE Team 3NT W H4 9 600 -10 10

12 BRADLEY Team 6 MCDOUGALL Team 3NT W H4 11 660 -1 1

6 MCDOUGALL Team 12 BRADLEY Team 3NT W H4 10 630 1 -1

2 FENAUGHTY Team 9 LOVE Team 4 W C6 10 130 -8 8

13 FILBEE Team 7 JENKIN Team 5 E SA 10 100 -3 3

9 LOVE Team 2 FENAUGHTY Team 5 E SA 9 200 8 -8

7 JENKIN Team 13 FILBEE Team 5 E SA 9 200 3 -3

4 CLARK Team 16 ELICH Team 5NT W H5 11 660 -11 11

5 REYNOLDS Team 19 SPENCE Team 6 E SA 11 100 6 -6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW -2 200 2
6 by EW -1 100 1
5 by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW = -110 1
4 by EW = -130 1
3 by EW +1 -130 1
3 by EW +1 -130 1
2 by EW +2 -130 1
2 by EW +2 -130 1
3 by EW +2 -150 1
2 by EW +3 -150 1
3NT by EW = -600 1
3NT by EW = -600 1
3NT by EW +1 -630 1
5NT by EW = -660 1
3NT by EW +2 -660 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
15 LONG Team	3 HASLAM Team	2 W	H5	10		130	0	0
19 SPENCE Team	5 REYNOLDS Team	2 E	SQ	11		150	-6	6
17 CHEESMAN Team	11 SWINSON Team	2 W	C6	10		130	-8	8
16 ELICH Team	4 CLARK Team	3 E	H7	9		110	11	-11
14 DALRYMPLE Team	10 LEY Team	3 E	C4	11		150	10	-10
1 POWELL Team	18 POWER Team	3 E	SA	10		130	10	-10
3 HASLAM Team	15 LONG Team	3 W	H6	10		130	0	0
18 POWER Team	1 POWELL Team	3NT E	C4	9		600	-10	10
10 LEY Team	14 DALRYMPLE Team	3NT W	H4	9		600	-10	10
12 BRADLEY Team	6 MCDOUGALL Team	3NT W	H4	11		660	-1	1
6 MCDOUGALL Team	12 BRADLEY Team	3NT W	H4	10		630	1	-1
2 FENAUGHTY Team	9 LOVE Team	4 W	C6	10		130	-8	8
13 FILBEE Team	7 JENKIN Team	5 E	SA	10	100		-3	3
9 LOVE Team	2 FENAUGHTY Team	5 E	SA	9	200		8	-8
7 JENKIN Team	13 FILBEE Team	5 E	SA	9	200		3	-3
4 CLARK Team	16 ELICH Team	5NT W	H5	11		660	-11	11
5 REYNOLDS Team	19 SPENCE Team	6 E	SA	11	100		6	-6

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	-2	200	2
6 by EW	-1	100	1
5 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	=	-110	1
4 by EW	=	-130	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
2 by EW	+2	-130	1
2 by EW	+2	-130	1
3 by EW	+2	-150	1
2 by EW	+3	-150	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
5NT by EW	=	-660	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1