Boards Results

TOOWOOMBA NOVICE TEAMS 2012 - MATCH 6

Board No: 9
Dealer: N, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -210

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

4 CLARK Team 16 ELICH Team 5NT W H5 11 660 -11 11

18 POWER Team 1 POWELL Team 3NT E C4 9 600 -10 10

10 LEY Team 14 DALRYMPLE Team 3NT W H4 9 600 -10 10

2 FENAUGHTY Team 9 LOVE Team 4 W C6 10 130 -8 8

17 CHEESMAN Team 11 SWINSON Team 2 W C6 10 130 -8 8

19 SPENCE Team 5 REYNOLDS Team 2 E SQ 11 150 -6 6

13 FILBEE Team 7 JENKIN Team 5 E SA 10 100 -3 3

12 BRADLEY Team 6 MCDOUGALL Team 3NT W H4 11 660 -1 1

15 LONG Team 3 HASLAM Team 2 W H5 10 130 0 0

3 HASLAM Team 15 LONG Team 3 W H6 10 130 0 0

6 MCDOUGALL Team 12 BRADLEY Team 3NT W H4 10 630 1 -1

7 JENKIN Team 13 FILBEE Team 5 E SA 9 200 3 -3

5 REYNOLDS Team 19 SPENCE Team 6 E SA 11 100 6 -6

9 LOVE Team 2 FENAUGHTY Team 5 E SA 9 200 8 -8

14 DALRYMPLE Team 10 LEY Team 3 E C4 11 150 10 -10

1 POWELL Team 18 POWER Team 3 E SA 10 130 10 -10

16 ELICH Team 4 CLARK Team 3 E H7 9 110 11 -11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW -2 200 2
6 by EW -1 100 1
5 by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW = -110 1
4 by EW = -130 1
3 by EW +1 -130 1
3 by EW +1 -130 1
2 by EW +2 -130 1
2 by EW +2 -130 1
3 by EW +2 -150 1
2 by EW +3 -150 1
3NT by EW = -600 1
3NT by EW = -600 1
3NT by EW +1 -630 1
5NT by EW = -660 1
3NT by EW +2 -660 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
4 CLARK Team	16 ELICH Team	5NT W	H5	11		660	-11	11
18 POWER Team	1 POWELL Team	3NT E	C4	9		600	-10	10
10 LEY Team	14 DALRYMPLE Team	3NT W	H4	9		600	-10	10
2 FENAUGHTY Team	9 LOVE Team	4 W	C6	10		130	-8	8
17 CHEESMAN Team	11 SWINSON Team	2 W	C6	10		130	-8	8
19 SPENCE Team	5 REYNOLDS Team	2 E	SQ	11		150	-6	6
13 FILBEE Team	7 JENKIN Team	5 E	SA	10	100		-3	3
12 BRADLEY Team	6 MCDOUGALL Team	3NT W	H4	11		660	-1	1
15 LONG Team	3 HASLAM Team	2 W	H5	10		130	0	0
3 HASLAM Team	15 LONG Team	3 W	H6	10		130	0	0
6 MCDOUGALL Team	12 BRADLEY Team	3NT W	H4	10		630	1	-1
7 JENKIN Team	13 FILBEE Team	5 E	SA	9	200		3	-3
5 REYNOLDS Team	19 SPENCE Team	6 E	SA	11	100		6	-6
9 LOVE Team	2 FENAUGHTY Team	5 E	SA	9	200		8	-8
14 DALRYMPLE Team	10 LEY Team	3 E	C4	11		150	10	-10
1 POWELL Team	18 POWER Team	3 E	SA	10		130	10	-10
16 ELICH Team	4 CLARK Team	3 E	H7	9		110	11	-11

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 9
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	-2	200	2
6 by EW	-1	100	1
5 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	=	-110	1
4 by EW	=	-130	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
3 by EW	+1	-130	1
2 by EW	+2	-130	1
2 by EW	+2	-130	1
3 by EW	+2	-150	1
2 by EW	+3	-150	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
3NT by EW	=	-600	1
3NT by EW	+1	-630	1
5NT by EW	=	-660	1
3NT by EW	+2	-660	1