NOOSA WINTER TEAMS - MATCH 5
Board No: 10
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 70
Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 HARRIS Team 8 OLSEN Team 1NT E 6D 6 100 0 0 2 KELLY Team 5 MELLINGS Team 1NT E TS 5 200 7 -7 3 JAKES Team 7 HART Team 1NT E 7D 4 300 9 -9 4 ANDREW Team 13 HAWKINS Team 1NT E 3D 7 90 -7 7 5 MELLINGS Team 2 KELLY Team 1NT E 3D 7 90 -7 7 6 MALTBY Team 14 QUIGLEY Team 1NT E 4D 6 100 0 0 7 HART Team 3 JAKES Team 1NT W 4S 7 90 -9 9 8 OLSEN Team 1 HARRIS Team 1NT E 6D 6 100 0 0 9 WEBBER Team 18 HARRISON Team 2 
SKC 8 90 0 0 10 MCDONALD Team 17 MUSGRAVE Team 1NT E 6D 6 100 0 0 11 ROUGHLEY Team 16 MCNAMEE Team 1NT E 6D 6 100 5 -5 12 BECKETT Team 20 GODDARD Team 1NT E 8D 5 200 0 0 13 HAWKINS Team 4 ANDREW Team 1NT E 6S 5 200 7 -7 14 QUIGLEY Team 6 MALTBY Team 1NT E 2D 6 100 0 0 15 MIDGLEY Team 19 SMITH Team 2 S2H 7 100 0 0 16 MCNAMEE Team 11 ROUGHLEY Team 1NT E 3D 7 90 -5 5 17 MUSGRAVE Team 10 MCDONALD Team 1NT E 6D 6 100 0 0 18 HARRISON Team 9 WEBBER Team 1NT E 8D 6 100 0 0 19 SMITH Team 15 MIDGLEY Team 2 
NAC 7 100 0 0 20 GODDARD Team 12 BECKETT Team 1NT W 6D 5 200 0 0
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 1NT by EW | -3 | 300 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 3 |
| 1NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | -1 | 100 | 8 |
| 2 by NS | = | 90 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | = | -90 | 3 |
| 1NT by EW | = | -90 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | -1 | -100 | 1 |