NOOSA WINTER TEAMS - MATCH 5
Board No: 16
Dealer: W, Vul: EW, Room Datum: 60
Go to Previous Board Go to Next Board Alternative display format
Teams Score Imps
North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks NS EW
NS
EW
1 HARRIS Team 8 OLSEN Team 2 
SAC 8 110 0 0 2 KELLY Team 5 MELLINGS Team 1NT W 3D 7 90 0 0 3 JAKES Team 7 HART Team 1NT W QH 7 90 -5 5 4 ANDREW Team 13 HAWKINS Team 2NT W 6H 7 100 0 0 5 MELLINGS Team 2 KELLY Team 1NT W 3H 7 90 0 0 6 MALTBY Team 14 QUIGLEY Team 1NT W 6H 7 90 -5 5 7 HART Team 3 JAKES Team 3 
WQC 8 100 5 -5 8 OLSEN Team 1 HARRIS Team 2 SAC 8 110 0 0 9 WEBBER Team 18 HARRISON Team 2 NTC 9 140 8 -8 10 MCDONALD Team 17 MUSGRAVE Team 2NT W TD 6 200 3 -3 11 ROUGHLEY Team 16 MCNAMEE Team 3 NAD 10 170 6 -6 12 BECKETT Team 20 GODDARD Team 1NT W 6H 3 400 7 -7 13 HAWKINS Team 4 ANDREW Team 2NT W TD 7 100 0 0 14 QUIGLEY Team 6 MALTBY Team 2 SKC 8 110 5 -5 15 MIDGLEY Team 19 SMITH Team 2NT W QH 7 100 0 0 16 MCNAMEE Team 11 ROUGHLEY Team 2 N3S 7 50 -6 6 17 MUSGRAVE Team 10 MCDONALD Team 2NT W 6H 7 100 -3 3 18 HARRISON Team 9 WEBBER Team 2NT W 5H 10 180 -8 8 19 SMITH Team 15 MIDGLEY Team 2NT W 6H 7 100 0 0 20 GODDARD Team 12 BECKETT Team 2NT W QH 7 100 -7 7
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 16 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 1NT by EW | -4 | 400 | 1 |
| 2NT by EW | -2 | 200 | 1 |
| 3 by NS | +1 | 170 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | +1 | 140 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | = | 110 | 3 |
| 3 by EW | -1 | 100 | 1 |
| 2NT by EW | -1 | 100 | 6 |
| 2 by NS | -1 | -50 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | = | -90 | 4 |
| 2NT by EW | +2 | -180 | 1 |